Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 634709003321999371
of course, there are a few men; but those are the outliers
They should be able to make the decision based on a proper information
fallacy
Because bad ideas and believes still drive your decisions
proper information is an IDEAL
You have a good chance at getting divorced, for example.
most times you don't have that luxury
No it's a libertarian position
and if you start placing all your faith in the information, you are easily fooled and dont' recognize when you are being counter-productive
It's likely- that your wife will make most of the financial decisions.
You always can check your surroundings
And go for further information
Oh dear
checking surrroundings is critical
I am willing to prove myself wrong
looking for more info is as well
TFW 50 000 years ago there was only one guy who successfully propagated his genes to modern day <:GWmythiFeelsBadMan:391321619748093972>
Childhood frens all gotten into big politics
how could it be
analysis paralysis is a thing
That's why I have read their pseudoscientific papers
that is good for making a counter-argument
but then those people don't care about accuracy
Man, cad today was dull
Wanted to blow my brains out
if they did, the papers wouldn't be pseudo scientific
those 3 look like theyre about to shoot up a school <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
If you want to gambling being the outlyer, that's your choice, but considering what can be lost, again- you may as well be a smoker, or risk playing with hard drugs, that's how bad it's gotten between men and women.
Over of my points is a lot of boys follow the movement and have no idea if they had any problem to start
It is odd that people don't call Ghenghis a serial rapist
yeah, that's why i can't stand people that throw around statistics as they serve absolutely no purpose
was it rape?
Like none of your local Romanian town rapists will ever come close to the Ghenghis record
it isnt rape if women is conquered <:powerful:595334910764515338>
Yes, there's such a bad paper because there are broken methodology studies everywhere
those listening won't have the time to process and most stat analysis are interpretation
Why did statisticial drown in a lake?
Lake was 4 feet deep on average
make an argument that stands on it's own merit with as little external evidence required to comprehend the argument's merits