Drywall confirmed pro-abortion?

probably

a lot of libertarians/ancaps are

Not even like reasonably, I reckon

Like late-term

Probably even wants abortion survivors (fetuses that survive) to just die or something

I don't know on which planet Tim Pool lives on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTGxOjPRTLY

99% girls wear pants, 99.99% boys wear pants. How is that not 'gender neutral'?

We don't see women rejected employment for wearing trousers. Men crossdressing would never see a day of employment as they would be deemed perverts. Even trannies get more tolerance than hairy men would if they chose to wear a skirt.

How the fuck are trousers not gender-neutral attire if both genders can wear them without social damage (or in worse case, violence directed at them)? Tim Pool is so fucking blue pilled that he probably doesn't even know that "men" is not a fucking gender. Men are gender-neutral. Only women have a gender. There's women, and others.

Tim "Gender Neutral is bad" Pool.

Men = adults (gender-neutral).
Women = female adults.
Girls = children (potentially gender-neutral).
Boys = slaves.

hot take

These are the origins. Back in the day, "girls" were dressed in skirts. That means all children, male and female. Only after reaching a certain age, they were accepted as weremen (gender that does no longer exist as male role has been destroyed) and wifmen (women).

Boy is what you call servants and slaves.

Or your apprentice, but ye boy used to have the same use as "you there"

Well, anyone on a socially lower ladder... although usually restricted to males.

That said, women are worshipped for their eggs, so they are on a higher peg to begin with, so mentioning "restricted to male inferiors" is redundant.

Afaik women don't usually wear the same type of pants that men wear

Exactly, men have pockets

Men also don't typically wear tight fitting pants, especially towards the ankles, because they prefer a more "chunky" look

If clunky=actually comfortable than yes. Men tend to not compromise for looks

Yeah, women don't have the same ballspace issue either, so comfort is not a problem with tighter pants

Men also shouldn't wear tight shorts for the same reason, which then also informs the shape of the pants

If a woman asks what the deal is with baggy pants, ask what the deal is with blouses

Exactly, so anyone who tells us that there's actually gender neutral clothing out there, they're just lying to themselves

No, gender neutral clothing totally exists. It's just that so does gendered clothing and recognizing the difference is important

Well ok exceptions exist

Shaping societal norms around exceptions rather than norms is fucking stupid though

Yup

@randomNPCno3 I know of some gendered clothing but they are for women. The only gendered clothing I know of that is for men is the kilt (which is ironically a skirt).

Skirt => for women
Kilt => for weremen
Trousers => gender-neutral

There's different kinds of trousers

If you live outside of Scotland, there's no clothing that women are scorned for wearing. Except in Muslim countries...

In Islamic countries, they are more... "egalitarian" in terms of limiting dresscode of both genders.

Is what we were saying, there is a distinct difference between men and women's pants

@randomNPCno3 There are different kinds of trousers. However, trousers are split between gender-neutral and women's.

No woman is going to be punched for dressing incorrectly.

That said, a woman wouldn't be punched even if they punched first and without provocation.

Mainly because as a culture, we don't hit women. Unless forced

Because never-hit-a-girl.