Message from @2K
Discord ID: 619218234595475466
>helped russia
dunno
they are still poor af
And he does seem to be reasonably popular too
They are still poor but he has helped fix that
they get less than a dollar as minimum wage per hour
Economically? A little better than Spain.
Militarily? Inefficient and wasteful manpower.
Socially? We are talking about a country which the average male life expectancy is 65 years and has some serious drinking issues.
He is improving the Economy
the sanctions have crippled them
I'm pretty sure their economy has contracted
Militarily they have a modern army and also have nukes which pretty much stop any invasion
The UK have nukes as well
So?
Unless the EU wants several major cities to be wiped off the map
They would never attempt to invade Russia
EU has enough nukes to wipe out all major russian cities tho
Due to terrian only
too
and we can always build more
And Russia could also just use the Scorched Earth tactic in any war
in ukraine and belarus
and caucasus
Just let Putin recreate the USSR
we should help Russia
we are talking about influence mostly tbh
not taking them over
Let him take Ukraine and Belarus and the caucasus
did you ask ukrainians and georgians if they want to be russians again tho?
It would be better for them to be taken over by Russia then the EU
It would be for the greater good
again
lmao
Based and Commiepilled
something something just another political Union to demolish
@The Electric Lizard talking about being blind out of hate...
The Georgian on the server is going to strongly disagree with you
Well i do really hate the EU
https://order-order.com/2019/09/05/prof-vernon-bogdanor-parliament-can-achieve-nothing/ a little hope considering recent events
Consitutionally it is well worth considering to declare the Fixed term Parliments act as unconstitutional as it is a law binding Parliament's choices of the day
We have very little in terms of a constitution, but the Sovereignty of Parliament is pretty much it. Parliament can neither be bound by its predecessors, as it cannot bind its sucessors. The Fixed Term Parliament Act, should be regarded as unconstitutional as it binds a Parlimament by requiring a 2/3 majority vote, rather than than a 50%+1 vote.