Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 641329912883445790


2019-11-05 16:53:30 UTC  

All religions have a god

2019-11-05 16:53:54 UTC  

It doesn't always go by the name of "God", but the meaning of their god is practically the same

2019-11-05 17:09:48 UTC  

`All religions have a god `

2019-11-05 17:13:58 UTC  

since there are religions that do not have or need gods I'd say that that statement is wrong

2019-11-05 17:16:07 UTC  

`It doesn't always go by the name of "God", but the meaning of their god is practically the same`

2019-11-05 17:16:25 UTC  

then we disagree on what a 'god' is😄

2019-11-05 17:23:36 UTC  

Chad Agnosticism

2019-11-05 17:30:49 UTC  

Religions by definition have a god or gods

2019-11-05 17:31:44 UTC  

And this is exactly why this nonsense started that "atheists can be religious", no they can't

2019-11-05 17:31:58 UTC  

Atheism is the religion of unbelief

2019-11-05 17:32:27 UTC  

Because one day complete morons started entering the theist/atheist debate, they muddied the waters about what "god" is, and then boom you have people claiming atheist religions exist

2019-11-05 17:33:02 UTC  

Ironically (contrary to what whiic claimed) I'm the guy who's arguing in favor of "fewer genders" so to speak.

2019-11-05 17:33:32 UTC  

Atheist religions are a paradox, it's contradictory

2019-11-05 17:33:50 UTC  

It only means that religious atheists are confused, they don't understand their own ideas

2019-11-05 17:34:28 UTC  

For example, the Greek gods, the Roman gods, or the Hindu gods

2019-11-05 17:34:36 UTC  

Those are not all-powerful, or all-good, or all-knowing, or all-present

2019-11-05 17:34:39 UTC  

Not a single one of them is

2019-11-05 17:34:48 UTC  

Yet they're considered gods

2019-11-05 17:35:32 UTC  

Why is that? Because what makes something or someone a god is the supernatural (i.e. above nature)

2019-11-05 17:35:53 UTC  

Basically as long as it's above nature, it's supernatural, and then it can be god or god-like

2019-11-05 17:36:06 UTC  

It doesn't mean that it must be at the very top of the god-like existence

2019-11-05 17:36:15 UTC  

So there's a wide spectrum of "god" forms

2019-11-05 17:36:53 UTC  

And this is when people started to realize that they needed more accurate ways to describe religion

2019-11-05 17:37:21 UTC  

A definition that covers the whole spectrum of all gods and god-like beings

2019-11-05 17:38:01 UTC  

> A definition that covers the whole spectrum of all gods and god-like beings

There's only two genders.

2019-11-05 17:38:11 UTC  

Yes, that's my whole point

2019-11-05 17:38:17 UTC  

God, or not god

2019-11-05 17:38:19 UTC  

There's only god/god-like, or not god/not god-like

2019-11-05 17:38:29 UTC  

And atheistic religions have no god

2019-11-05 17:38:37 UTC  

Atheists by definition do not have a religion

2019-11-05 17:38:44 UTC  

Hello autism

2019-11-05 17:38:46 UTC  

No, they have no god, by definition

2019-11-05 17:38:52 UTC  

you fucking autist

2019-11-05 17:38:54 UTC  

All religions have a god

2019-11-05 17:39:17 UTC  

A being that *cannot possibly* be explained

2019-11-05 17:39:36 UTC  

It's *literally impossible* to use *natural means* to explain it

2019-11-05 17:39:52 UTC  

That's what makes something a supernatural being

2019-11-05 17:40:08 UTC  

Yes, but it doesn't make all supernatural beings gods

2019-11-05 17:40:28 UTC  

It doesn't, but atheists do not believe in anything that is supernatural, because that is the *realm* of gods

2019-11-05 17:40:33 UTC  

The supernatural is the home of the gods

2019-11-05 17:40:45 UTC  

The natural is the home of the earthly creatures