The discussion where I *agreed with you* that posting vids instead of making an argument is a shit tactic?

@Αγωνιζῆς An atheist can participate in religious rituals/symbolism, but cannot be religious.

why not though?, there are religions that do not feature gods and even if they do, not believing in them does not exclude one from supporting the religion or being a religious person in that capacity

All religions have a god

It doesn't always go by the name of "God", but the meaning of their god is practically the same

`All religions have a god `

since there are religions that do not have or need gods I'd say that that statement is wrong

`It doesn't always go by the name of "God", but the meaning of their god is practically the same`

then we disagree on what a 'god' is😄

Chad Agnosticism

Religions by definition have a god or gods

And this is exactly why this nonsense started that "atheists can be religious", no they can't

Atheism is the religion of unbelief

Because one day complete morons started entering the theist/atheist debate, they muddied the waters about what "god" is, and then boom you have people claiming atheist religions exist

Ironically (contrary to what whiic claimed) I'm the guy who's arguing in favor of "fewer genders" so to speak.

Atheist religions are a paradox, it's contradictory

It only means that religious atheists are confused, they don't understand their own ideas

For example, the Greek gods, the Roman gods, or the Hindu gods

Those are not all-powerful, or all-good, or all-knowing, or all-present

Not a single one of them is

Yet they're considered gods

Why is that? Because what makes something or someone a god is the supernatural (i.e. above nature)

Basically as long as it's above nature, it's supernatural, and then it can be god or god-like

It doesn't mean that it must be at the very top of the god-like existence

So there's a wide spectrum of "god" forms

And this is when people started to realize that they needed more accurate ways to describe religion

A definition that covers the whole spectrum of all gods and god-like beings

> A definition that covers the whole spectrum of all gods and god-like beings

There's only two genders.

Yes, that's my whole point

God, or not god

There's only god/god-like, or not god/not god-like

And atheistic religions have no god

Atheists by definition do not have a religion

Hello autism

No, they have no god, by definition

you fucking autist

All religions have a god

A being that *cannot possibly* be explained

It's *literally impossible* to use *natural means* to explain it

That's what makes something a supernatural being

Yes, but it doesn't make all supernatural beings gods