Message from @Hopix
Discord ID: 643467241379069973
Having to refer to him as Lord Nigel Farage would send some people divvy lmao
He'd make the HoL more interesting
Even if he did want to abolish it
I see no reason to abolish it
It does its job as a tempering chamber
He saw them as unelected people who thus shouldn't serve the public because they're out of touch
Does its job though
I'm not saying it doesn't
There should be a chamber like that, but should be elected
What's the point then
Just have one chamber
There can be longer terms and other differences
we have 6 years and parliament is 4
Or you could have elections where only lorts could stand
*d
Or just leave it how it is
Isn't there too many of them on hol anyway? You could reduce it to like 1/4th or something
*in
its interesting that the chinese firm would put money in the failing business... they now have a vested interest in the UK doing well
Btw I've answered my own question from earlier
"“the Parties [i.e. the UK and the EU] agree to consider” a number of defence policies, including UK “collaboration in relevant existing and future projects of the European Defence Agency” and “collaborative defence projects.”
The language in the latest iteration of the Political Declaration is actually weaker than the version Theresa May struck: the former PM committed the UK to “enable” the policies, while the new version only promises to “consider.”"
Doesn't sound as bad as I thought
Chinese taking over British business @wacka
Not a good thing.
Nah it pisses me off
I guess it's better than it going under though
That keeps us tied to the EU, which is a good thing. @Hopix
It says we'll "consider" to cooperate in military schemes
Not a very strong tie
The intelligence services are desperate to keep access to European collective intelligence networks
We'll strike a deal, keeping us close
Yeah that's fine as long as it can be unilaterally undone
why wouldnt it be good for china to be buying a failing company?
they now have money on the line...
More Chinese control in the economy and government.
if UK goes down... china lose money
We should nationalise that company
no.. the opposite
I'm probably with Nathan on this one tbh
more control in Chinas government
We don't have more control in China? What?