Message from @Szayel's Pooppion
Discord ID: 486720242865668096
@PastPresentFuture That's exactly what I thought. Woman came second so it is 'natural' to want to dominate over man. Think about it this way, too: Satan is second best and tried to take over God's place by the same ploys....
Hmmm 🤔
Makes me wonder if Satan is actually a salty female. 🤔 😆
This is why Jesse is correct when he says men represent Christ on earth
Satan is often depicted as a humanoid with a goat head and female breasts
That explains it! LoLz XD
When a woman returns to god, (the spiritual order) she is no longer of her father the devil.
That’s why women need a man to lead them to god.
But woman came from man which is of God. Woman came from the rib of man and thus lack logic which makes her susceptible of the devil's ways.
This was a really good question this week!
I agree with you, @PastPresentFuture
It was an amazing question
Satan was created by god
Just as woman was created by god
Please pardon my correction, @PastPresentFuture but the Bible does not explicitly tell us how Satan was made.
But then again, let me go back and research that.
I stand corrected: There is proof in the scriptures. My apologies, @PastPresentFuture
No worries👌
AMAAAAAAAZzzzzzzin!!!!
Omg
Sosososoaososossosososossososos trueeeee
Preach
The fact that a lot of women cannot accept the natural order shows they’re in a fallen state
@Deleted User Ezekiel 28 goes into detail on Satan’s creation and job description - Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
17 Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.
18 Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee.
19 All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more.
@Rick Turpin Thank you so much for pointing out the Scripture! Don't know how I missed that one! God bless you! 🙏
@Deleted User I thank God for your kind words. We all have a part to play, the same spirit working within each of us to edify his church. Where one lacks another will provide and vice versa. Hopefully I can be of more use to you all as time goes on.
lets start by sayin that Abraham never existed - no trace of him in his own town ... no need to thx me
and the sources are from?
You would have to cross reference Ur in Sumeria to pharaoh Khety IV and see if he turns up - We know Joseph was around (see pic below)
because there is no record from egypt of any jewish slave or plague described in the holy fable
too
Because the chronology is wrong - David Rohls new chronology on wiki
what we have a record of from egypt that the jews lived long before the bible happened in Israel in the middle east
do not forgett that even Israeli archeologiest tried to fid some trace of Moses in egyt - they did not find anything - so moses did not exist too
all Your sources are abses on the bible which is not a historic book
The chief archeology and rabbis in Israel don’t acknowledge their own history - as Egyptology is used to date the bible (the chronology is off so nothing fits) -
another major point is the argument of DNA which tells U another story - it disproves the bible