Message from @HunterxTitan
Discord ID: 645373762304213030
That’s why they get way more protection by the state
At least make a solid argument
You have a right to wear whatever you want yet you are banned from wearing nothing
Protecting children = inconsistency
> it's not a human right to wear nothing
Ok Hillary
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
That just seems very inconsistent
So you want me to argue that showing genitals to children is fine?
Who is deciding that wearing whatever you want is a human right yet deciding not to wear anything is not a human right
I’m not going to argue that sorry
Hilary telling us about kids again
nice strawman. nobody is arguing for pedophilia
I think women taking their tops off is a human right, but there should be one rule
You're having to make an awful lot of exceptions in your system @bobthebuilder69
That's even more inconsistent @bobthebuilder69
huge gaping hole in your argument though.
Even those that violate the principles OF your system.
All I want for Xmas is Corbin's free Wi-Fi
^
If women’s boobs aren’t a sexual bodypart, then it shouldn’t be sexual assault if I grabbed someone’s tits without there consent
Same to be honest, I just want free internet mate @Weaboo Vampire
So people can wear whatever they want yet they can't wear nothing yet a partial exemption is made for women. @bobthebuilder69
So wearing no top in public is fine
Showing genitals isn’t
Let's argue what a genital is
yes
I think my balls are not
mumm
Well maybe we could have a law like, public nudity is fine during school time
So I can expose them
Genitals are your dick and balls, or vagina
Nah
Disagree
what about the gooch
Scientifically they are
Gooch is fine
Mumm yes the gooch
Ooooooo science
Testicles are a sexual body part