How the fuck do you know

They can turn around

They can leave

And kids have way more protection by the government

Have you polled them?

Nothing stopping them from walking away.

Because they can’t consent

That seems very inconsistent

Lol you’re stupid

Kids can’t consent

Hahahahahahuahahahaa

Lmao

You're so inconsistent

That’s why they get way more protection by the state

At least make a solid argument

You have a right to wear whatever you want yet you are banned from wearing nothing

Protecting children = inconsistency

> it's not a human right to wear nothing

Ok Hillary

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

That just seems very inconsistent

So you want me to argue that showing genitals to children is fine?

Who is deciding that wearing whatever you want is a human right yet deciding not to wear anything is not a human right

I’m not going to argue that sorry

Hilary telling us about kids again

nice strawman. nobody is arguing for pedophilia

I think women taking their tops off is a human right, but there should be one rule

You're having to make an awful lot of exceptions in your system @bobthebuilder69

That's even more inconsistent @bobthebuilder69

huge gaping hole in your argument though.

Even those that violate the principles OF your system.

All I want for Xmas is Corbin's free Wi-Fi

^

Your own system contradicts itself.

If women’s boobs aren’t a sexual bodypart, then it shouldn’t be sexual assault if I grabbed someone’s tits without there consent

Same to be honest, I just want free internet mate @Weaboo Vampire

So people can wear whatever they want yet they can't wear nothing yet a partial exemption is made for women. @bobthebuilder69

So wearing no top in public is fine

Showing genitals isn’t

Let's argue what a genital is

yes