That's even more inconsistent @bobthebuilder69

huge gaping hole in your argument though.

Even those that violate the principles OF your system.

All I want for Xmas is Corbin's free Wi-Fi

^

Your own system contradicts itself.

If women’s boobs aren’t a sexual bodypart, then it shouldn’t be sexual assault if I grabbed someone’s tits without there consent

Same to be honest, I just want free internet mate @Weaboo Vampire

So people can wear whatever they want yet they can't wear nothing yet a partial exemption is made for women. @bobthebuilder69

So wearing no top in public is fine

Showing genitals isn’t

Let's argue what a genital is

yes

I think my balls are not

mumm

Well maybe we could have a law like, public nudity is fine during school time

So I can expose them

Genitals are your dick and balls, or vagina

Nah

Disagree

what about the gooch

Scientifically they are

Gooch is fine

Mumm yes the gooch

Ooooooo science

Testicles are a sexual body part

Big daddy science

"Scientist say so" idgaf

praise Jesus

You can’t argue that balls aren’t sexual

I just did

They are filled with sperm

Women are filled with sperm

Or at least mine is

The science is literally fact

Doesnt make her a walking sex object

Or does it

HHMMMMM

What?

being filled with sperm is a poor argument for why something is sexual

No it isn’t