That seems very inconsistent

Lol you’re stupid

Kids can’t consent

Hahahahahahuahahahaa

Lmao

You're so inconsistent

That’s why they get way more protection by the state

At least make a solid argument

You have a right to wear whatever you want yet you are banned from wearing nothing

Protecting children = inconsistency

> it's not a human right to wear nothing

Ok Hillary

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

That just seems very inconsistent

So you want me to argue that showing genitals to children is fine?

Who is deciding that wearing whatever you want is a human right yet deciding not to wear anything is not a human right

I’m not going to argue that sorry

Hilary telling us about kids again

nice strawman. nobody is arguing for pedophilia

I think women taking their tops off is a human right, but there should be one rule

You're having to make an awful lot of exceptions in your system @bobthebuilder69

That's even more inconsistent @bobthebuilder69

huge gaping hole in your argument though.

Even those that violate the principles OF your system.

All I want for Xmas is Corbin's free Wi-Fi

^

Your own system contradicts itself.

If women’s boobs aren’t a sexual bodypart, then it shouldn’t be sexual assault if I grabbed someone’s tits without there consent

Same to be honest, I just want free internet mate @Weaboo Vampire

So people can wear whatever they want yet they can't wear nothing yet a partial exemption is made for women. @bobthebuilder69

So wearing no top in public is fine

Showing genitals isn’t

Let's argue what a genital is

yes

I think my balls are not

mumm

Well maybe we could have a law like, public nudity is fine during school time

So I can expose them

Genitals are your dick and balls, or vagina

Nah

Disagree