If it comes to that, rightwingers may even argue that you **earned** privileges by being born a specific race. Because rightwing doesn't see unfairness in anything.

haidt's moral foundations are a good bases
Justice/injustice, Fairness/unfairness, liberty/oppression, sanctity/degradation, authority

Again, I remember Aydin Paladin having made a video about it but I didn't find it the last time I searched for it.

thats fairness nothing is free

God can't intervene in his creation.

Church, pray for his intervention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolt_Against_the_Modern_World

This is a great book on Right Wing Traditionalism

@whiic nice straw man but yeah obviously we don’t care for just the ethnostate it’s just we always end up debating it

@snake It's your choice.

Whatever

@Monstrous Moonshine and that is conservativism that is dead for a good reason.
cause ya'll purity spiral into oblivion. You see the difference between ideological possession and religion is how well it maps onto the world. both right and left wing ideas are incomplete pictures.
American conservativism is radical thinking that incorporates both order and chaos to maintain order and regenerate itself.
Similar to Christianity and other religions.

'conservatism is progressivism driving the speed limit'

progressivism is meaningless

Paleo or social conservatism?

progressing to what?

Will purity spiral?

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/826117-it-may-be-inferred-again-that-the-present-movement-for

This [Northern conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn.

- Robert Lewis Dabney Chaplain, Confederate Army; Chief of Staff, Stonewall Jackson

dont know what it progresses to, it goes as fast as it needs to go, which is naturally through culture, gradually

its like working towards a computer when you start in 100AD

itll come when its time to

no radical enforcing like the Leftists want

Fords consrvativism will purity spiral

like forcing latinos to call themselves latinx

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_history

This is what is generally meant by 'progressives'

> Whig history (or Whig historiography) is an approach to historiography that presents the past as an inevitable progression towards ever greater liberty and enlightenment, culminating in modern forms of liberal democracy and constitutional monarchy.

if they eventually call themselves that by their choice in the culture, fine

Nah I don’t think so

Reactionaries reject it

in america during the formation of the wigg party yes thats what it means

christianity was extremely progressive

> Whig history is a form of liberalism, putting its faith in the power of human reason to reshape society for the better, regardless of past history and tradition. It proposes the inevitable progress of humankind. Whig history has many similarities with the Marxist theory of history, which presupposes that humanity is moving through historical stages to the classless, egalitarian society to which communism aspires.

It is just a less radical form of Marxism

lmao

and thats from what?

Read Revolutions and the revolutionary tradition in the West, 1560–1991 by David Parker

wiki

so where is the whig party?

What?

I'm saying the view of Whig Historiography is just a less radical version of Marxist Historiography

yea that sounds more like revisionist history