if they eventually call themselves that by their choice in the culture, fine

Nah I don’t think so

Reactionaries reject it

in america during the formation of the wigg party yes thats what it means

christianity was extremely progressive

> Whig history is a form of liberalism, putting its faith in the power of human reason to reshape society for the better, regardless of past history and tradition. It proposes the inevitable progress of humankind. Whig history has many similarities with the Marxist theory of history, which presupposes that humanity is moving through historical stages to the classless, egalitarian society to which communism aspires.

It is just a less radical form of Marxism

lmao

and thats from what?

Read Revolutions and the revolutionary tradition in the West, 1560–1991 by David Parker

wiki

so where is the whig party?

What?

I'm saying the view of Whig Historiography is just a less radical version of Marxist Historiography

yea that sounds more like revisionist history

One of inevitable social progress towards liberalism, often presented positively

by marxists that claim liberalism is a step towards marxism

Youtube is Facilitating the Scamming of MILLIONS While Doing NOTHING About it
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvE2SBiPc_4

It has many parallels

liberalism = freedom to do what you want so long as it doesnt hurt other people

Egalitarianism is one of them

its like saying christianity is marxism

marxism = fuck you if you do any of these things, or dont give your money to the state, youre gulagged

Not really, read up the quoted part again

>liberalism = freedom to do what you want so long as it doesnt hurt other people
That's denying the societal impacts of individual's actions

obtaining food is the goal of marxism, because captial markets do it thats marxism

Marxism is a radical egalitarian philosophy which aims to remove all barriers

They tend to focus more on class barriers

Lately they have been focusing on gender and sexuality

Traditonalism is embracing these barriers and the reality of Natural Order

while I agree there consequences to everyones actions and take a more extensionality perspective on it (see dostophesky or solzenhen).
Force does not equate to a better way

as the catholics would say you can do anything you want but would be better off doing these things

but a free choice made is better than a coerced choice

It depends on a lot of factors

Homogeneous societies are the optimal conditions for Traditional societies

but can become stale and unproductive and prevent changes that could improve society

Deracinated, atomized hedonist multiculturalism is optimal for Marxist egalitarianism

Where everyone is a rootless transnational individual disconnected from his heritage, living in a pod and eating bugs

yes but hedonism will lead to a swing back towards traditionalism as it currently is now

Good and we need to accelerate it

ugh an accelerationist...