Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 645095455209947142
Whether I agree with their goal or not
I thought you said it was the opposite of the ends justify the means
The opposite of it is "path = goal"
You don't agree with that idea, since you said you would increase other ethnic demographics if that furthers your goal of the ethnostate
"90% of the American public said they'd rather loose the war than give full equality to the American Negro"
To be honest I haven’t really thought about it that deeply
Most people haven't, that's why I asked
Also being earraped in VC
Also, when their goal is white ethnostate (with less minorities than there *already* is, meaning closed borders is not adequate solution), and path is unimportant, you must take it with grain of salt when "Genocide Not Required, Voluntary Self-Deportations and Encouragement".
I'm willing to take that at its word, somewhat, but I'm also curious about the cited source there. I'm not trying to be a badger, but I wonder what the poll context was, that's all. It doesn't really matter though; I see it as believable that quite a number of people might have responded in such a way at the time
Now, most people have multiple goals in life
No just redraw the borders, see whiic wants to make it seem like are only option is violence
The declaration of "no genocide" is never of the same importance as the goal of "white ethnostate".
@lungfish So my point is that being a WN can be mutually exclusive to being a Nazi
That the only way to do this is violence
We have the situation RIGHT NOW where violence isn’t needed
The fact that the refer to Iceland super majority in a vacuum, and a goal, reveals how **TOTALLY INDIFFERENT** they are to what goals they need to take to make USA into Iceland.
The other issue I have with WN's is that, since they so often agree with the idea that the ends justify the means, their other goals and values (not regarding the ethnostate) are also put in question
WHO THE FUCK TALKS ABOUT ICELAND LMAO
I want to find this guy
Who talks about Iceland so much
Saying "I'd rather lose the war to the Nazis than give up segregation" doesn't *totally* support the idea that WNs don't have Nazi sympathies. And I will admit that I, personally, have some Nazi sympathies. I'm not playing the leftist card here
And rather than having principles, they make declarations on reduction of purity, like instead of 99%, they are happy with 95%, 90%, etc.
As if we could trust them.
Because those are the cucks in the eyes of more pure than them.
Wish I knew about this libgen website earlier
something sounds incredibly strange about 'my goal is to create an ethnostate'. i dont know anyone that sets their goal to have a specific set of political rules where you live... such an ideological weird concept to me
And those who are more pure, are on the right. **AND YOU NEVER PUNCH TO THE RIGHT.** It's the rule.
@whiic That's the third issue I have with WN's, they will eventually start infighting and then their true principles will come out
I guess since Charlottesville the "never punch to the right" is in the trash bin, but that's only proof of your lack of principle. You tossed that principle away.
There's nothing principled.
Like much of rightist parlance, "don't punch right" is a parody of the left's "don't punch down", which is equally ridiculous
Because principals are made with a conscience commitment to it, loyalty to ones own just comes out and if it isn’t controlled you get a confusing mess
"Never punch to the right" is a lack of principle. But tossing aside "never punch to the right" because of Charlottesville is about being unprincipled in being unprincipled. **THAT'S GUINNESS RECORD LEVEL OF LACKING SPINAL COLUMN!**
I'm loyal to people who deserve loyalty
It must be earned, always