They would have preferred if Ameri-Nazis didn't fight German-Nazis.

And I'm willing to accept edgy sources, it doesn't have to be in the New York Times

If your goal is the ethnostate, then the question would be this: is it ok to infringe on the construction of an ethnostate and temporarily increase the number of other ethnic demographics in order to eventually have an ethnostate?

https://muse.jhu.edu/book/30108

Chapter 3, Page 81 @lungfish

But they are totally not nazis even when they are ethnonationalist AND socialist AND authoritarian AND culturally pro-censorshit, AND against free speech AND Jews.

Yeah sure

Otherwise they are nothing alike to Hitler's Germany.

Ah yes, once again the Tribe is providing the best WN statistics

Ok, so then you consider the goal to be above the path

I’m not seeing a problem

Use libgen to pirate a free version @lungfish

Looking into it now

Oh, yeah, this is behind paywall. Can you quote the relevant portion?

Since you think the goal is more important, this means you are likely to break your principles, which means you're unprincipled, since you would even break your promise of an ethnostate temporarily

Sorry, I know I'm asking a lot, I'm just curious

And maybe now you understand why I consider so many WN's to be fools

They think the ends justify the means, which as I see it only results in a straying away from the goal

Whether I agree with their goal or not

I thought you said it was the opposite of the ends justify the means

@lungfish

The opposite of it is "path = goal"

You don't agree with that idea, since you said you would increase other ethnic demographics if that furthers your goal of the ethnostate

"90% of the American public said they'd rather loose the war than give full equality to the American Negro"

To be honest I haven’t really thought about it that deeply

Most people haven't, that's why I asked

Also being earraped in VC

Also, when their goal is white ethnostate (with less minorities than there *already* is, meaning closed borders is not adequate solution), and path is unimportant, you must take it with grain of salt when "Genocide Not Required, Voluntary Self-Deportations and Encouragement".

I'm willing to take that at its word, somewhat, but I'm also curious about the cited source there. I'm not trying to be a badger, but I wonder what the poll context was, that's all. It doesn't really matter though; I see it as believable that quite a number of people might have responded in such a way at the time

@whiic yes exactly

Now, most people have multiple goals in life

No just redraw the borders, see whiic wants to make it seem like are only option is violence

The declaration of "no genocide" is never of the same importance as the goal of "white ethnostate".

@lungfish So my point is that being a WN can be mutually exclusive to being a Nazi

That the only way to do this is violence

We have the situation RIGHT NOW where violence isn’t needed

The fact that the refer to Iceland super majority in a vacuum, and a goal, reveals how **TOTALLY INDIFFERENT** they are to what goals they need to take to make USA into Iceland.

The other issue I have with WN's is that, since they so often agree with the idea that the ends justify the means, their other goals and values (not regarding the ethnostate) are also put in question

WHO THE FUCK TALKS ABOUT ICELAND LMAO

I want to find this guy