i think someone is confusing law and morality again

^

@SufferBuddy well that's just your feelings getting on the way. It is worth discussing rationally. You don't have to justify it, just explore how and why it isn't.

@ManAnimal What the difference then?

I'm not dumb if I'm right.

and you are sure you are right because...?

***I F***

ah.. yes you are

Because I am.

How do we figure that part out?

even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally

and there you have it, the rhetoric of a dumb ass

not even trying

rhetoric of a coward tbh

fair

Orange man good

but legalism bad!

orange man ok

At least that squirrel is useful compared to squirrels who willy nilly hide thousands of nuts only to lose them.

relativist much?

I mean I do, I just made that decision about that topic, when I held my niece the day she was born. We learned that her father was a statutory rapist, and the thought that he might do something to her, well we know my feelings on that. I am sure I have made myself clear on that topic.

Anybody else who thinks the rule of law should be curtailed?

No.

what are you? baba?

fucking anarchist

hey Ferris, check out the latest Pin in the other room

Cause everything that takes itself for an absolute is pure evil in of itself?

aight

But in some cases, yes.

i'd pay for that, yes GMAE

@Ferris Baba’s a Libertarian SOCIALIST, silly

i think jack pinned it

Make rule of law absolute, and law can outlaw you.

Why should I not scalp the man who actually rapes supposed son of mine?

LOL

If I have to break the law I will do so.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck that is exactly what a marxist-lennenist anarcho-communist wants you to think

Scalping is too quiet and too quick

Imagery my friend.

Good thinking @IAmAlwaysWatching