Message from @SufferBuddy
Discord ID: 640249305889767444
fair
Orange man good
but legalism bad!
orange man ok
At least that squirrel is useful compared to squirrels who willy nilly hide thousands of nuts only to lose them.
relativist much?
I mean I do, I just made that decision about that topic, when I held my niece the day she was born. We learned that her father was a statutory rapist, and the thought that he might do something to her, well we know my feelings on that. I am sure I have made myself clear on that topic.
Anybody else who thinks the rule of law should be curtailed?
No.
what are you? baba?
fucking anarchist
hey Ferris, check out the latest Pin in the other room
Cause everything that takes itself for an absolute is pure evil in of itself?
aight
But in some cases, yes.
i'd pay for that, yes GMAE
@Ferris Baba’s a Libertarian SOCIALIST, silly
i think jack pinned it
Make rule of law absolute, and law can outlaw you.
Why should I not scalp the man who actually rapes supposed son of mine?
If I have to break the law I will do so.
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck that is exactly what a marxist-lennenist anarcho-communist wants you to think
Scalping is too quiet and too quick
Imagery my friend.
Good thinking @IAmAlwaysWatching
He’s not a NATIVE
he IS naive
This is why I say even the rule of law should **NOT** be absolute.
CAN NOT
there is no should
Only Sith deal in absolutes.
one cannot write a rule for every contingency
Can not there is no should? What if you CAN and WILL?
ought implies can, cannot implies ought not
>following the rules
Yes, they can't @ManAnimal
But they **TRY**
truth
You people are SEMANTICFAGGS