Message from @Nat
Discord ID: 645805835376656445
i think thats a rather unfair claim
How do you not know this shit?
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck did we observe protogenesis?
no?
exactly
You've obviously never actually listened to creationists @Lucienne d'Anwyl
@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) Do you mean abiogenesis?
just because you think poorly of some people that argue an idea
ah yes, thanks
abiogenesis
@Lucienne d'Anwyl I don't think bpoorly of them
doesnt mean that the idea itself is bad
@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) that has 0 to do with Evolution
likewise you are arguing like such things are monolithic
@Jack of Trades I know, that's my point
as opposed to different people having different views
@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) not anymore than we can make the case for creationism simply based on observation, yes
i sure do hope this one isnt porn
@Lucienne d'Anwyl No, again. I'm arguing that the creationists are stupid because I've actually listened to their arguments. Creationism is, by and large, the denial of evolution.
o
k good
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck exactly
They don't just "have different views" They are IGNORANT of the facts.
because some people you dont like propagate an idea
@Nat would smash
you thus deny anything similar to their ideas
because you dont like them
@Lucienne d'Anwyl Stop right there, I don't hate christians
10/10
peak male
same <:ahegao:462286952335671296>
and are conflating their views with the idea as a whole
I don't dislike them, they're p-aright
mega true
But creationism is based on ignorance, not observation. It is the denial of it and accepting assertion over fact.