Message from @Jack of Trades
Discord ID: 645805700613931028
and you didnt observe the complete evolution of life on earth either
It's based on the dogmatic assumption that the bible is the literal inerrant word of God
@Lucienne d'Anwyl Didn't need to, that's not how observation works in science
pretty sure creationism is literally just the assertion that God created life. that's it lol
but you really can't make a case for Creationism being based on OBSERVATION
considering that christians recognize the bible as having been written by men
Aren't you in school for physics?
i think thats a rather unfair claim
How do you not know this shit?
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck did we observe protogenesis?
no?
exactly
You've obviously never actually listened to creationists @Lucienne d'Anwyl
@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) Do you mean abiogenesis?
just because you think poorly of some people that argue an idea
ah yes, thanks
abiogenesis
doesnt mean that the idea itself is bad
@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) that has 0 to do with Evolution
likewise you are arguing like such things are monolithic
@Jack of Trades I know, that's my point
as opposed to different people having different views
@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) not anymore than we can make the case for creationism simply based on observation, yes
i sure do hope this one isnt porn
@Lucienne d'Anwyl No, again. I'm arguing that the creationists are stupid because I've actually listened to their arguments. Creationism is, by and large, the denial of evolution.
o
k good
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck exactly
They don't just "have different views" They are IGNORANT of the facts.
because some people you dont like propagate an idea
@Nat would smash
you thus deny anything similar to their ideas
because you dont like them
@Lucienne d'Anwyl Stop right there, I don't hate christians
10/10
peak male