what if people commit violence

Its the only game in his wishlist too wtf

but its a misinterpretation

what then

https://thehill.com/policy/international/asia-pacific/469732-pro-democracy-lawmakers-detained-in-hong-kong

you cant hold someone accountable for other peoples actions

action is not the same as speech even if the speech is a cALL to action

@Shai'tan No. You hold people responsible for what they do. If they preach violence... well... then you establish whether or not they have done so widely and if there is an actual problem. But fucking hell... every exception punches a massive hole into FREE SPEECH.

people either have individual faculty.... or they DO NOT

if people DO NOT, speech CANNOT be free

period

Even a call to action is still just a bunch of fucking words.

exactly

The people who act are the criminals.

exactly

Ma you think free speech is only speech or expression also

?

it's an expression

freedom of expression

Writing for example

Does that count

and that does NOT mean 'free' as in 'free beer'

Or nah

writing on paper that you own

Drawings.

That's where I'm going lol

I'm just leading into it

Speech is vibrations which is energy, to ban hateful speech is to ban certain vibrations which is energy. Energy is good.

"Your rights END the moment that YOUR rights impede the rights of another"

Lewd and immoral drawings? Well, fuck it. Who the fuck are hurt?

that rule covers the social media 'writings' because you don'tt own their 'bulletin board'

you don't have the right to put your sign in my yard without my permission

This eventually crosses over into Sargon and Uzalus debate: if two consenting adults have incest should that be illegal

incest is illegal?

Up to 40 years in prison in the US

incest isnt illegal in all cuntries

federal law?

I don't know

That doesn't stop muslims.

i thought something like that would be state by state

incest shouldnt be illegal