Bruh Jesse trying to call Gillette gotta be the funniest thing I’ve seen all day

It's such an *obvious* thing that I've been crowned king for pointing it out, for some reason.

...

i dont even know how to respond to something that idiotic

ok how many black men have been shot by police for pulling up their pants for not wearing belts?

im genuinely curious

Think it was just an example of dumb things people think they can get away with

If I were to debate Destiny on that topic, I'd end up ripping my hair out because I basically need to be un-interrupted for 3-5 minutes to fully explain the importance of something or the details of a police procedure.

Destiny is *incapable* of letting someone get more than a sentence in.

i can show you examples that contrast that statement

That's why I think he's such a worthless scum, because his debate with Ape had him interrupting Ape *then complaining when Ape wouldn't let him finish a sentence*.

but ape was literally doing the thing you accused destiny of doing?

Keeping an unequal number of interruptions and sources is basically the quickest way to make a debate to enter the dumb-zone.

stawmanning and gish galloping?

ape was literally yelling “shut up!” like a child while he was trying to state his side of the argument

I don't remember Ape gish galloping *immediately* after Destiny asked him not to, the opposite of which I remember happened.

im listening to it rn put it on yourself

turn the video on yourself**

Destiny is the biggest beta male I've seen on the internet

I'm not going to listen to it a second time.

I stopped giving leftist YouTubers the time of day.

so you just sit in an echo chamber of people who agree with you?

why not challenge your ideas and see if they stand to other peoples ideas

It doesn't work like that.

why doesnt it?

When you do a basic glance at manipulation/propaganda strategies, the "market of ideas" where you intentionally looking for the best, fair arguments doesn't work in reality.

i talk to people i disagree with all the time, if im proven wrong or something i look to strengthen my argument or change my point of view

When most of the arguments you come across with follow the same set of rules and come from the same instinctual motivation, it doesn't matter if you experience that argument first hand or just think of it while daydreaming.

thats why you challenge that argument, and if its not sound then you disregard it

Basically it's an "oh, you used that argument because it's emotionally manipulative."

you can separate feelings from an argument on certain topics

Debate doesn't allow you to disregard an argument without a paragraph of rhetorical strategies on why it's a shit argument. "That's a shitlib's argument" is much simpler.

Lmao

The majority of people in comment sections and chat rooms simply cannot separate their feelings from their arguments.

I'd much rather be in an echo chamber than spend my free time reading "Trump/Russia collusion!" for the literal thousandth time.

ok and if you disagree with that for whatever reason

Once you know the underlying motivations and them and their ilk's arguments, I don't see why there is a point in constantly engaging with them.

why not challenge it?

Their arguments are all the same, extremely predictable

I gain nothing new listening to them

i could say the same for conservatives