@Laucivol Which is a differnt claim entirely

@Storin I don't care if we're talking about a jungle gym, that's a buttfucking stupid claim and I'm sick of suffering fools

@Jack of Trades Einstein once envisioned something no one else did. Some things are never revealed to the public. This "chemical" exists

@Ralin Storm You've got one more, give me ANY evidence that such a chemical exists.

@Jack of Trades no

Or something else that actually leads tot he conclusion youv'e made

Okay, bye bye

riddle me this, batman.... http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE/
The signatures of over 1,000 Structural Engineers that have designed skyscrapers world wide put their careers on the line... why do this?

bye bye

It's all a CIA psyop

And now I never have to read his retarded thoughts ever again

Oh, I'm not backing up Ralin - I was more replying to MA. And, truth is, I don't recall exactly - just seemed reasonable enough.

@Laucivol I know you aren't, I was stating how your statement was reasonable.

reasonable... to a non-engineer

@ManAnimal That's the equivalent of "97% of climate scientists agree"

I was contrasting it to the conspiracy theory.

Dude I just returned from my run, I have no idea what the topic of conversation is <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

But jet fuel usually means 9/11

that doesn't understand the difference between lateral and axial loading

not the same @TheBrsrkr. scientists don't have to make things WORK

they don't test a design and know what the word 'tolerance' even means

ANY skyscraper moves a good 30 ft left to right with the wind

That's not the reason why it's shit, the reason is just because 1000 of them say it doesn't make it true or even credible

it's designed to do so

if it was too ridgid, it wouldn't take the strain over time

Okay, thinf about that MA - you were speaking about the entire jetfuel matter. I do happen to actually understand those differences.

That said the quality of construction is suspect, irrespective of conspiracy.

crushing a pencil end to end is different than snapping it in half

what aspect of the construction is suspect?

and what evidence outside the collapse on 9/11 in which a steel structure suffered complete catastrophic failure suggests such a concern?

Quality of materials as I understand it. Which is why that petition you liked is fair enough.

@Storin I never got a chance to find out the exact claim, but "I tHinK somEOnE mIXeD iN A ChemICAL to MAkE it DisinTeGRAte" is buttfucking retarded.

was there evidence of abnormal construction work? forged safety reports? @Laucivol

Well, it's *New York City*. Corruption is *assumed*.

that claim IS spectulation; HOW the building was brought down is uncertain but a structure doesn't collapse neatly within it's footprint just 'by accident'

gotta admit, it is more likely they skimped on materials or on some ancillary thing that would have prevented catastrophical breakdown

how?

@Zakhan which would show on inspections and repairs, there's nothing

cost-cutting

@Zakhan Not likely, I looked into this pretty heavily for about a decade.

yeah, then we'd have to assume the inspectors and repairmen were in on it, too

you can't design a building to collapse neatly into it's footprint INTENTIONALLY