Message from @Ralin Storm

Discord ID: 644331747294707713


2019-11-14 00:21:05 UTC  

If you don't, then I am going to banish you from my sight forevermore

2019-11-14 00:21:21 UTC  

no steel building suffered catastrophic failure before 9/11

2019-11-14 00:21:35 UTC  

yet, it happend three times in one day within hours

2019-11-14 00:22:01 UTC  

@Jack of Trades If one had the power to create a building in order to collapse if an economic downfall ever occurred. How does removing evidence such as shipping it off to china seem implausible to you?

2019-11-14 00:22:06 UTC  

also, i used to do survivability tests with JP-5 (jet fuel)

2019-11-14 00:22:33 UTC  

if a carrier made of the same steel can survive such a fire....

2019-11-14 00:22:38 UTC  

@Ralin Storm You could find receipts, shipments, ANY evidence that such a chemical occurs.

2019-11-14 00:22:40 UTC  

You have 2 more.

2019-11-14 00:22:49 UTC  

*occurs/exists

2019-11-14 00:22:57 UTC  

It can't

2019-11-14 00:23:03 UTC  

@TheBrsrkr What can't?

2019-11-14 00:23:13 UTC  

There is a credible concern about the quality of the steel used in the construction of said buildings.

2019-11-14 00:23:14 UTC  

The carrier

2019-11-14 00:23:15 UTC  

Something that just disintegrates when you apply "a signal"?

2019-11-14 00:23:23 UTC  

Are we talking about 9/11?

2019-11-14 00:23:30 UTC  

'credible concern' from who's perspective?

2019-11-14 00:23:31 UTC  

@Laucivol Which is a differnt claim entirely

2019-11-14 00:23:49 UTC  

@Storin I don't care if we're talking about a jungle gym, that's a buttfucking stupid claim and I'm sick of suffering fools

2019-11-14 00:23:54 UTC  

@Jack of Trades Einstein once envisioned something no one else did. Some things are never revealed to the public. This "chemical" exists

2019-11-14 00:24:11 UTC  

@Ralin Storm You've got one more, give me ANY evidence that such a chemical exists.

2019-11-14 00:24:19 UTC  
2019-11-14 00:24:21 UTC  

Or something else that actually leads tot he conclusion youv'e made

2019-11-14 00:24:23 UTC  

Okay, bye bye

2019-11-14 00:24:25 UTC  

riddle me this, batman.... http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE/
The signatures of over 1,000 Structural Engineers that have designed skyscrapers world wide put their careers on the line... why do this?

2019-11-14 00:24:28 UTC  

bye bye

2019-11-14 00:24:28 UTC  

It's all a CIA psyop

2019-11-14 00:24:38 UTC  

And now I never have to read his retarded thoughts ever again

2019-11-14 00:24:45 UTC  

Oh, I'm not backing up Ralin - I was more replying to MA. And, truth is, I don't recall exactly - just seemed reasonable enough.

2019-11-14 00:25:01 UTC  

@Laucivol I know you aren't, I was stating how your statement was reasonable.

2019-11-14 00:25:02 UTC  

reasonable... to a non-engineer

2019-11-14 00:25:05 UTC  

@ManAnimal That's the equivalent of "97% of climate scientists agree"

2019-11-14 00:25:09 UTC  

I was contrasting it to the conspiracy theory.

2019-11-14 00:25:10 UTC  

Dude I just returned from my run, I have no idea what the topic of conversation is <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-11-14 00:25:19 UTC  

But jet fuel usually means 9/11

2019-11-14 00:25:19 UTC  

that doesn't understand the difference between lateral and axial loading

2019-11-14 00:25:34 UTC  

not the same @TheBrsrkr. scientists don't have to make things WORK

2019-11-14 00:25:51 UTC  

they don't test a design and know what the word 'tolerance' even means

2019-11-14 00:26:21 UTC  

ANY skyscraper moves a good 30 ft left to right with the wind

2019-11-14 00:26:24 UTC  

That's not the reason why it's shit, the reason is just because 1000 of them say it doesn't make it true or even credible

2019-11-14 00:26:26 UTC  

it's designed to do so

2019-11-14 00:26:41 UTC  

if it was too ridgid, it wouldn't take the strain over time