Message from @Ralin Storm
Discord ID: 644331747294707713
If you don't, then I am going to banish you from my sight forevermore
no steel building suffered catastrophic failure before 9/11
yet, it happend three times in one day within hours
@Jack of Trades If one had the power to create a building in order to collapse if an economic downfall ever occurred. How does removing evidence such as shipping it off to china seem implausible to you?
also, i used to do survivability tests with JP-5 (jet fuel)
if a carrier made of the same steel can survive such a fire....
@Ralin Storm You could find receipts, shipments, ANY evidence that such a chemical occurs.
You have 2 more.
*occurs/exists
It can't
@TheBrsrkr What can't?
There is a credible concern about the quality of the steel used in the construction of said buildings.
The carrier
Something that just disintegrates when you apply "a signal"?
Are we talking about 9/11?
'credible concern' from who's perspective?
@Laucivol Which is a differnt claim entirely
@Storin I don't care if we're talking about a jungle gym, that's a buttfucking stupid claim and I'm sick of suffering fools
@Jack of Trades Einstein once envisioned something no one else did. Some things are never revealed to the public. This "chemical" exists
@Ralin Storm You've got one more, give me ANY evidence that such a chemical exists.
Or something else that actually leads tot he conclusion youv'e made
Okay, bye bye
riddle me this, batman.... http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE/
The signatures of over 1,000 Structural Engineers that have designed skyscrapers world wide put their careers on the line... why do this?
bye bye
It's all a CIA psyop
And now I never have to read his retarded thoughts ever again
Oh, I'm not backing up Ralin - I was more replying to MA. And, truth is, I don't recall exactly - just seemed reasonable enough.
@Laucivol I know you aren't, I was stating how your statement was reasonable.
reasonable... to a non-engineer
@ManAnimal That's the equivalent of "97% of climate scientists agree"
I was contrasting it to the conspiracy theory.
Dude I just returned from my run, I have no idea what the topic of conversation is <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
But jet fuel usually means 9/11
that doesn't understand the difference between lateral and axial loading
not the same @TheBrsrkr. scientists don't have to make things WORK
they don't test a design and know what the word 'tolerance' even means
ANY skyscraper moves a good 30 ft left to right with the wind
That's not the reason why it's shit, the reason is just because 1000 of them say it doesn't make it true or even credible
it's designed to do so
if it was too ridgid, it wouldn't take the strain over time