say nothing for the short-stock of the airlines and the extra insurance granted to the owner

weeks before the attack

@Jack of Trades with the power these people have, evidence disappears

@Ralin Storm You have exactly 3 responses to demonstrate that you're joking or trolling

Goodnyaght everynyan! Rome is civilization

no black box was ever lost prior to 9/11

If you don't, then I am going to banish you from my sight forevermore

no steel building suffered catastrophic failure before 9/11

yet, it happend three times in one day within hours

@Jack of Trades If one had the power to create a building in order to collapse if an economic downfall ever occurred. How does removing evidence such as shipping it off to china seem implausible to you?

also, i used to do survivability tests with JP-5 (jet fuel)

if a carrier made of the same steel can survive such a fire....

@Ralin Storm You could find receipts, shipments, ANY evidence that such a chemical occurs.

You have 2 more.

*occurs/exists

It can't

@TheBrsrkr What can't?

There is a credible concern about the quality of the steel used in the construction of said buildings.

The carrier

Something that just disintegrates when you apply "a signal"?

Are we talking about 9/11?

'credible concern' from who's perspective?

@Laucivol Which is a differnt claim entirely

@Storin I don't care if we're talking about a jungle gym, that's a buttfucking stupid claim and I'm sick of suffering fools

@Jack of Trades Einstein once envisioned something no one else did. Some things are never revealed to the public. This "chemical" exists

@Ralin Storm You've got one more, give me ANY evidence that such a chemical exists.

@Jack of Trades no

Or something else that actually leads tot he conclusion youv'e made

Okay, bye bye

riddle me this, batman.... http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE/
The signatures of over 1,000 Structural Engineers that have designed skyscrapers world wide put their careers on the line... why do this?

bye bye

It's all a CIA psyop

And now I never have to read his retarded thoughts ever again

Oh, I'm not backing up Ralin - I was more replying to MA. And, truth is, I don't recall exactly - just seemed reasonable enough.

@Laucivol I know you aren't, I was stating how your statement was reasonable.

reasonable... to a non-engineer

@ManAnimal That's the equivalent of "97% of climate scientists agree"

I was contrasting it to the conspiracy theory.

Dude I just returned from my run, I have no idea what the topic of conversation is <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

But jet fuel usually means 9/11

that doesn't understand the difference between lateral and axial loading