Not fold, but turn to stone <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

@Storin If they proposed the next day to kill the queen you'd be chill with it

Nah, i'd be joining the royalists <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Behold pestilence

So you would make a choice

I thought it was just a furry.

Needs to be sterilized via trial of fire anyway.

The queen is probably the only woman I would listen to tbh 🤷

Idk you just seem to flip flop depending on the circumstance

i still can't believe i was banned on twitter for saying a pedo should go to jail and share a cell with a prisoner that'd attack them

That was the physical form of all that is disease

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCCftCV5syA

If the UK chose to become a republic, which is what I think you are angling would I be chill with it? Yes. If they tried to storm Buckingham and guillotine the monarchy? Fuck no.

@Storin Well I'd hope so, because those would be French people.

It's not going 'choose' to do anything, unless forced.

That just means they're not traitors, they're enemies.

Well the queen really doesn't do anything anyways so

not like your really changing much in that.

But them just fullfilling the final nail to kill the royal family

There's no reason to guillotine all monarchy. Might be good to guillotine Andrew, though.

She has far more power than peeps realise, she just chooses not to exercise it imo.

And for good reason

So if the upcoming King says "Change migration laws" and Parliament refuses

would you back the king

Latest stats put the UK at like 40% wanting an authoritarian leader and I think its something like 7-8% at wanting the monarchy back, those odds are not good for liberty or libertarianism 🤔

Parliament and democracy are well and truly on the way out in the UK tbh

*The people want a strong leader* <:powerful:595334910764515338>

I can provide great reading material on this.

BUF material.

So you would follow the king/royalty if they commanded actions in preservation of British state/people but detriment against these liberal intersectionalist ideas?

King Charles is not someone I would serve tbh 🤷

he is buffoon

What about king scrooge?

> if they commanded actions in preservation of British state/people
Sadly will never happen

They're too desperate to cling onto what little power they have left to act

Too cowardly to act, when needed.

Cause from the sound of it the people don't seem to much recognize them outside some ceremonial shit

I'm in a very tricky position, if the monarchy took charge I'd probably initially support it tbh because strength, however I think I am mostly on the side of liberty and individual rights, if you get a good tyrant there is no system better, and if you get a bad one there is no system worse

A monarch that signs the law which brings the death of their own people is no monarch to be served.