The head of the Judiciary responsible for law enforcement-he is chosen DIRECTLY by the people through a hierarchical system of communities of communities and so on down to the common man.

So basically he is like a prime minister but he doesn't have the authority to write the laws-there is no parliament for it, it's the constitution only who acts as a written law and everything else are discussionable clauses of clauses of the constitution.

The second one is the Chief-of-staff of the military and he acts as the supreme commander of all armed forces-in one way or the other on the territory.

It is THE ONLY purely hierarchical position a society should has and it is him who ultimately has an authority over military forces if civil unrest ensues.

E. g. if there are some kind of massive protests it is within his jurisdiction to yeet all the law enforcement, so this is why he MUST be on the Truimvirate.

His position is the result of a long string of requirements drawn by the military itself, but WITHIN the premises of the constitution.

It means, yes, the military can make *some* rules as to who is qualified to lead them, but ultimatley they can't break the constitution and if they do, than the judiciary can call the Triumvirate and yeet the supreme commander of the military and a part of his staff.

And the third one is the

no good name for him

but basically the guy who runs the economy.

Economy is comprised of series of enterprises who are given PERMITS,

it means they are controlled by the judiciary in a sense

to do some sort of activity but simultaneously they give off their production either to the military for the purpose of defense of the country,

or, they give off the products of their labour to the judiciary which then writes the rules to redistribute them among the citizens.

So,

NOT ALL CITIZENS GET THE SAME!

It's not communism, OK?

In return for what it produces different local communities give different productive enterprises different right and priviliges.

So in order for an enterprise to be successful it must produce something of an enough value so the locals don't yeet it out of their jurisdiction and give the permits to someone else.

Anyone who can convince a local council he can do some job can get a permit to do any sort of activity.

And once one gets the permit he can HIRE whomever he wants in accordance with the local rules.

This is how business is done in this system and if you want to be successful you must be skilled in a lot of things to be able to run a successful enterprise, which most people-AREN'T!

It means-we don't put anyone as chief of production for something cause muh, family, or the party, or whatever.

And enterprises ARE pitted against each other constantly on a varying scales and for a variety of reasons.

HOWEVER, any enterprise in the modern economy requires the produce of other products, be it materials, machines, special services or whatever.

It means that on some level there must be a SUPERSTRUCTURE which is comprised of various enterprises conflicting over each other for their produce.

This superstructure is what elects the economy representative in the Triumvirate and it's laws and regulations are entirely IN-BUILD by the enterprises themselves, but with in the limits of the constitution.

So, if the constitution says you can't pollute as shit, they can't do it.

Or if the constitution says no nuclear power or no coal, they can't do it either.

Ultimately the judiciary has control over the economy, but if they go too far, the enterprices have a hidden clause.

They can call in the military for the protection of their rights.

So ultimately-the system is simple

EVERYBODY IS PITIED AGAINST EVERYBODY ELSE

and

If there is a quarrel amongst the communities they take it to the Triumvirate to be decided by either a 2 to 1 vote or by a direct referendum.

Quite a complicated system indeed, but nevertheless, unique!

No place on the current political spectrum.

Indeed, because the result will be dependent on the population.
Ok, thats nice, guess i wouldnt mind this kind of system in a city state...
_yes i read all of it_
However i see a load of problems with this on a larger scale...

However, what about making every nation a confederation of city states run by such organizations on a local scale.

I think something like a modern reincarnation of the Greek -polis models.

Have you read the history of the ancient Greek?