Message from @yordanyordanov
Discord ID: 623591520376848386
I did.
And that would make you in non-nonsense-grandiose-terms A WHAT
I have a job and am part of the economy, I practice with my weapon from time to time and am a part of the national guard and I vote for people to hold communal offices and am part of the judicial structure.
Participate in all of the 3 spheres of society and be a member of it, so it is a part of you.
Double individual-communal relationship and when one of the spheres crashes with any of the other two-we take the matter to the triumvirate and if they proceed it becomes the subject of a referendum.
The SINGLE role of the Triumvirate is to propose the questions for referenda and the constitution is written by THE people through referenda proposed by the Triumvirate, not by any dictator or government or church or even parliament!
It's how it works.
Assuming the triumvirate is also democratically ellected...
A constitutional democracy with 3 prime ministers on undefined terms.
No its not.
Actually ONLY the structural democracy part of the parliament-e.g. the people who control the judiciary are democratically elected.
The other 2 are not.
I mean plus the head of the judiciary-who is elected from the elected representatives of elected representatives of elected representatives and so on down to the common man the other two are the heads of hierarchies, thou the economy isn't "technically" a hierarchy, but it's complicated, so, lets assume it acts like one.
The triumvirate is nothing but a ROUND TABLE-a place where teh heads, or their representatives, of each of the three institutions of society can meet and propose texts for referenda.
Referenda are the only way to change the constitution and are important for other stuff like production decisions or secession or the inclusion of territories and also for declaring war.
Basically-the super important stuff is either decided by a 2 to 3 vote in the Truimvirate, or by a direct referendum amongst all able-bodied, and minded, citizens of legal age.
The triumvirate is composed of:
The head of the Judiciary responsible for law enforcement-he is chosen DIRECTLY by the people through a hierarchical system of communities of communities and so on down to the common man.
So basically he is like a prime minister but he doesn't have the authority to write the laws-there is no parliament for it, it's the constitution only who acts as a written law and everything else are discussionable clauses of clauses of the constitution.
The second one is the Chief-of-staff of the military and he acts as the supreme commander of all armed forces-in one way or the other on the territory.
It is THE ONLY purely hierarchical position a society should has and it is him who ultimately has an authority over military forces if civil unrest ensues.
E. g. if there are some kind of massive protests it is within his jurisdiction to yeet all the law enforcement, so this is why he MUST be on the Truimvirate.
His position is the result of a long string of requirements drawn by the military itself, but WITHIN the premises of the constitution.
It means, yes, the military can make *some* rules as to who is qualified to lead them, but ultimatley they can't break the constitution and if they do, than the judiciary can call the Triumvirate and yeet the supreme commander of the military and a part of his staff.
And the third one is the
no good name for him
but basically the guy who runs the economy.
Economy is comprised of series of enterprises who are given PERMITS,
it means they are controlled by the judiciary in a sense
to do some sort of activity but simultaneously they give off their production either to the military for the purpose of defense of the country,
or, they give off the products of their labour to the judiciary which then writes the rules to redistribute them among the citizens.
So,
NOT ALL CITIZENS GET THE SAME!
It's not communism, OK?
In return for what it produces different local communities give different productive enterprises different right and priviliges.
So in order for an enterprise to be successful it must produce something of an enough value so the locals don't yeet it out of their jurisdiction and give the permits to someone else.
Anyone who can convince a local council he can do some job can get a permit to do any sort of activity.
And once one gets the permit he can HIRE whomever he wants in accordance with the local rules.
This is how business is done in this system and if you want to be successful you must be skilled in a lot of things to be able to run a successful enterprise, which most people-AREN'T!
It means-we don't put anyone as chief of production for something cause muh, family, or the party, or whatever.
And enterprises ARE pitted against each other constantly on a varying scales and for a variety of reasons.
HOWEVER, any enterprise in the modern economy requires the produce of other products, be it materials, machines, special services or whatever.