I really don't know how far would it get but the thing is the US can save themselves if they want to and in the process create an example for the whole world to follow.

Question is:

Would they?

we should support Assad and try to build a strong alliance between both the kurds and assad since only a dictator can run a country with Druze, muslims, christians etc living right next door to each other

i mean the whole idea of a democracy in the middle east is retarded never mind in a place like Syria

well syria is a "democracy"

it's just not liberal

though it took a step in that direction in 2011

with the referendum that lifted the party restrictions on legislative participation and made it so that the president was to be directly elected

rather than appointed by the legislature

but you still need a dictator like Assad in Syria when you havew druze, muslims, christians etc living right next to each other

I'm not sure you need a dictator

but you do need a government that doesn't fuck around

the main problem is that most ME countries have a leader that's biased against the other religions/sects

so you just get purges

but Assad is a part of a peaceful muslim sect

yes which is why we need to build a strong alliance between Assad and the Kurds, the best we can do is stop the Turks from fucking it up

Make the Imperium great again.

@tea_in_space You're not wrong. As shit as Yugoslavia was, the local dictator, Tito, managed to hold together nations whose idea of a saturday afternoon is to genocide each other

So that could work in Syria

https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/activist-death-09242019134327.html China dindu nuffin

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-26/chinas-new-500-megapixel-super-camera/11539176

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-religious-ethnic-minorities-uighur-muslim-harvest-organs-un-human-rights-a9117911.html

How reliable is the independent? I don't know all the satire sites, is this one of them?

Based and redpilled.

We should be doing the same. @notaglobe

@randomNPCno3 dunno, I mean, they wouldn't want to give drumfh any reason to continue fighting china

so when the un going to do something about china

(they wont)

Why are the climate change activists silent on China?

So much for being the "UN" panel if they are silent on Asia.

And people still listen to a robotic Swedish teen rather than these kind of people, who are ACTUALLY well informed and better suited to give talks at summits like this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlHiEN1zTKI

They're silent on China because it doesn't help their true cause of undermining the west

The truth about the climate would force them to back down from attacking Europe, the US, all of it

Most of what Greta's saying is the same shit I learned in Environmental Studies in middle school, lol.

Wonder what's worth applauding stuff what I already know and is super obvious since school days, and all of a sudden people feel that's "revolutionary"

It's just called PR @ashzeppelin

That's what it actually is. Nothing more, nothing less. And according to them the West, and in greater range-all whites, should pay the price and bear the burden. That's what it really boils down to.

Well, China also has a controlling role in the UN as well...

So the UN can't really glimpse at the excesses of China... even if they wanted to.