People from practically all of our colonies fought for us to some extent
@The Electric Lizard Then they became independent shitholes, and made your country a shithole.
LMAOOOOOOO
Keep the cultures separate, We just need to stop sending soldiers to the middle east
>Yet you want to invade
Fuck off @The Electric Lizard
We could have much better relations with these countries if we just stopped occupying them
You're not even a good troll.
Blocked tbh
I was joking before
this just funny now tbh
My legitimate view is that we should just stop intervening in the Middle East to maintain good relations
and let them just have a fight to the death in the name of allah?
If they want to, But we should play no part in it
but doesn't that just go against everything we are about
We wouldn't have liked it if the Arabs intervened in every war that ever occurred in Europe
I actually agree with muslims killing each other, so I'm an interventionist only in so far as non-muslims are involved somehow.
syrians are mostly arabish
they're arabized groups
Non-Interventionism is the way to go
they have been culturally arabized to an extent but they're still distinct from arabs proper
Nearly every intervention has made things worse
Just look at Libya
making libya better wasn't the purpose of intervening there
That's my point
We attacked for our interests and made things significantly worse there
Look at Libya now and compare it to Libya under Gaddafi
We should stop intervening
But I'm fine with weapon sales
Might as well be in control of it
It gonna happen anyway
i only agree with non-intervention because i don't want the current order to assert its interests
They are much less likely to take action against us
if we had a properly nationalist government i would advocate for imperialism
If we are the ones supplying their spares etc
@Death in June Just no
nations are never static
bring on the kings party?
Because Imperialism worked so well last time
you're either growing or you're dying
@The Electric Lizard It actually did
