Message from @wacka

Discord ID: 628559714346860545


2019-10-01 11:48:21 UTC  

Didn't remain campaign overspend too?

2019-10-01 11:48:33 UTC  

Yea I was just saying that leave overspent

2019-10-01 11:48:42 UTC  

And then joshu sent me an article he didn’t even read

2019-10-01 11:48:49 UTC  

Remain mailshotted every house in the country using tax funds iirc, among other overspendings

2019-10-01 11:49:00 UTC  

This is too dumb now

2019-10-01 11:49:03 UTC  

Jesus fuckinf christ

2019-10-01 11:49:07 UTC  

I’m going back to work

2019-10-01 11:49:07 UTC  

Yes you are.

2019-10-01 11:49:13 UTC  

Good

2019-10-01 11:49:29 UTC  

Yes I did my friend, the assumption that was made was it was counted as overspending due to the fund not being legitimate

2019-10-01 11:49:33 UTC  

Even though they were

2019-10-01 11:49:33 UTC  

> Leave overspent!!!

...

> Well so did remain

...

> This is dum

2019-10-01 11:49:42 UTC  

At the very least

2019-10-01 11:49:46 UTC  

At the very very least

2019-10-01 11:49:58 UTC  

Divide by zero<:npc:502497359419408384>

2019-10-01 11:50:09 UTC  

It was a fair game of overspending.


.... Apart from the 7m in leaflets

2019-10-01 11:50:12 UTC  

Let's ignore that

2019-10-01 11:50:33 UTC  

"Boris lies boris lies, he touches thighs!"

2019-10-01 11:50:37 UTC  

and government importing foreign powers to also put pressure down

2019-10-01 11:50:43 UTC  

remember america guud man

2019-10-01 11:51:53 UTC  

you have 2 authoritarian-ish governments ... and someone says "hey do you want to get rid of one of those" ... and still millions voted to keep it :/

2019-10-01 11:52:10 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-10-01 11:53:37 UTC  

Found more on the spending

2019-10-01 11:54:01 UTC  

Turns out vote leave did overspend but it was due to bad advice by the watchdog

2019-10-01 11:54:17 UTC  

Good jobe guys

2019-10-01 11:54:47 UTC  

waiting for the supreme court to say actually they've decided that those who wrote the law, wrote it wrong and the misinterpritation was correct interpritation

2019-10-01 11:54:48 UTC  

"Mr Justice Leggatt said the commission had “misinterpreted the definition of ‘referendum expenses’”, adding: “The source of its error is a mistaken assumption that an individual or body which makes a donation to a permitted participant cannot thereby incur referendum expenses."

2019-10-01 11:55:23 UTC  

"As a result of this error, the Electoral Commission has interpreted the definition in a way that is inconsistent with both the language and the purpose of the legislation.”

2019-10-01 11:55:42 UTC  

They upheld their decision but ruled that they didn't understand their own rules.

2019-10-01 11:55:45 UTC  

It kind of doesn't matter anyway given the remain mailshot, that dwarfs anything leave could have achieved

2019-10-01 11:56:25 UTC  

Real constitutional reform is needed urgently

2019-10-01 11:56:37 UTC  

So yeah

2019-10-01 11:56:47 UTC  

Inc, the abolishment of the bbc and the supreme court

2019-10-01 11:56:57 UTC  

The Russian brexit narrative has been destroyed by the FT article

2019-10-01 11:57:09 UTC  

And yes leave overspent but due to an electoral commision fuck up

2019-10-01 11:57:15 UTC  

It's nearly the 5th of November, the kind of reform we need

2019-10-01 11:57:17 UTC  

imagine Russia actually did help us exit the union

2019-10-01 11:57:23 UTC  

The government straight up spent 7m on leaflets

2019-10-01 11:57:40 UTC  

@system11 we still have some really good legal history that something like that would destroy

2019-10-01 11:57:57 UTC  

precedent is something hard to build