Message from @PureEvilPie

Discord ID: 629435117697236992


2019-10-03 21:44:55 UTC  

Well it does; not every company needs their own data centres

2019-10-03 21:45:09 UTC  

Makes sense to share data centres at a specialised company

2019-10-03 21:45:29 UTC  

someone even punted putting a big data project in AWS. like ... what.. do you even under... no you dont.

2019-10-03 21:46:05 UTC  

Urmm, cloud is just storing your data in another companies physical servers

2019-10-03 21:46:12 UTC  

its the bills

2019-10-03 21:46:23 UTC  

Yea but they pale in comparison

2019-10-03 21:46:34 UTC  

AWS for some use cases isn't cost effective

2019-10-03 21:46:51 UTC  

i couldnt even save money running a goddamn forum server of my own

2019-10-03 21:46:54 UTC  

To long term running costs of data resources, land, maintainable buildings

2019-10-03 21:47:03 UTC  

Cleaning and office staff for the data centres

2019-10-03 21:47:10 UTC  

tech debt

2019-10-03 21:47:13 UTC  

Upgrades

2019-10-03 21:47:16 UTC  

It’s a huge amount of work

2019-10-03 21:47:19 UTC  

if you already have your own datacentres the cost benefit figures are quite a bit different

2019-10-03 21:47:23 UTC  

Having your own enterprise level data centre

2019-10-03 21:47:56 UTC  

a couple of projects ended up staying on premesis because AWS was simply too expensive for them

2019-10-03 21:49:17 UTC  

storage particularly is nasty. i did official AWS training a while back and part of the training is an explanation of where you get charged. and then i realised just how much money amazon must make from this

2019-10-03 21:50:01 UTC  

Yea they make money

2019-10-03 21:50:05 UTC  

They are a business

2019-10-03 21:50:13 UTC  

But cloud does make sense in a lot of cases

2019-10-03 21:50:26 UTC  

You can fire a lot of your staff you don’t need to manage the data

2019-10-03 21:50:37 UTC  

Resource costs are hugeeeeeee

2019-10-03 21:50:38 UTC  

i suspect that quite a few cloud hosted people did not in fact accurately work out how much they could end up paying, it's also designed to vendor lock you

2019-10-03 21:50:55 UTC  

Vendor locking is why I keep shooting down the idea at work

2019-10-03 21:51:09 UTC  

That and I simply don' trust Amazon

2019-10-03 21:51:41 UTC  

i trust them honestly

2019-10-03 21:51:48 UTC  

But they're going ahead and using it anyway because they have no choice, so i'll get overruled on everything, then shit will go wrong and i'll tell them I told them so

2019-10-03 21:51:52 UTC  

Which happens alarmingly regularly

2019-10-03 21:52:05 UTC  

as much as i trust any corp anyway, but theyre not as evil as google at a cursory glance

2019-10-03 21:52:15 UTC  

Well

2019-10-03 21:52:18 UTC  

They’re evil to their staff

2019-10-03 21:52:32 UTC  

Warehouse workers and such

2019-10-03 21:53:04 UTC  

but speaking as someone who used to have specific responsibility for services *definitely working all the time* it would take a hell of a cost saving to not want to look after it personally.

2019-10-03 21:53:28 UTC  

Depends on the size

2019-10-03 21:53:32 UTC  

My company is lloyds

2019-10-03 21:53:37 UTC  

Their data centre in Leeds

2019-10-03 21:53:40 UTC  

Is fucking HUGE

2019-10-03 21:53:48 UTC  

So fucking expensive to maintain

2019-10-03 21:53:52 UTC  

It’s their biggest building

2019-10-03 21:54:30 UTC  

you can get a bit of paper from amazon citing 99.99% uptime (not sure if they do 5 9s?), at 3am in the morning when shit is totally broken that piece of paper is worth absolutely nothing. your customers dont care about the piece of paper either, they hold the business responsible

2019-10-03 21:55:12 UTC  

so im expecting our 'zomg cloud' phase to end the moment someone puts something actually critical there and it breaks