tics

No

It's framing

It's not even framing as such

Its also a statement of facts about a situation that is up in the air

It's just an entirely subjective opinion of two economists lol. It has the same validity as publishing a report with the predictions of economists who were pro brexit

Yes there is likely to be a reduction in growth in the short term.

But you can't say "THE UK WILL LOSE THIS EXACT NUMBER"

Because that is totally bullshit, since you don't know

I do agree that there is likely to be damage to the economy in the short term

The no brexit forecasts also don't seem take into account things like china

Looks like essentially an extrapolation of previous

When the whole of Europe has seen a downturn

So it would come to reason we would have also seen some downturn even if we didn't vote to leave.

Even then the predictions see a return to form in the medium term anway

Which is quite literally exactly what every sane brexiteer is saying

Short term losses

What is short term to you

Because leading brexiteers say it could take 50 years

to see any benefits to this

I'll take that report, it predicts a return to good growth by 2022

That is still even short term tbh

That will be a miracle considering we are heading into a recession this yaer

So

Do you agree with it or not then?

Just the bits that agree with your narrative?

Hey we could see a return to growth in 3 years

still means we have punished ourselves

and made ourselves poorer

We are not heading into a recession lmao

Economically maybe...maybe.

We have had 0% growth

for the past 2 quarters

Economics isn't everything

3 quarters means a recession

If it was I would work 12 hours per day 7 days a week

i assume you were referring to Mogg
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/shortcuts/2018/jul/24/two-50-or-100-years-when-do-leavers-think-brexit-will-pay-off

not really the full story to say '50 years'

No a recession is a decline

....

0% is stagnation