Message from @Eccles
Discord ID: 631426853047107594
The office does
Eccles baseless point
I already said if he found a way around the law
This would still. Apply
Put that strawman down
Conjecture
Your impossible
Seriously
The only precident that would be set is that the executive is subject to the courts enforcing the law
Ignoring my point
Geez
Like I said
If he's found a way around the law, then the court ruling will be immaterial
Not from what being reported
Unless you've seen the case files
What is being reported?
That the case is attempting to get the court to send a letter on behalf of boris before the Benn deadline is even up?
Haven't seen that being reported
Obvious they are going to do the legal groundwork before the deadline since there won't be time after
So don't see what the issue is
He would be plenty wise to not do it
If its legal
Links to infrmation supporting your points are allowed, you know. Actually, would prbably be benefical
I'm attempting to find it, read it a few days ago, however things may have changed due to yesterday's ruling
If it has I will accept that
I cannot find that specific report, therefore I must be mistaken
The clerk distinction here would be more of they send the letter for him
Or they force him to sign it
If they force him to sign it, OK maybe
They wouldn't need for him to sign it, they can send a letter on his behalf
Send for him?
Court acting as executive
Yes
Which is erotion of separation of powers further
And therefore is important
Important, but doesn't really change anything on the ground
Sign or prison is fine
Doesn't change anything until a lawsuit uses it as precident
If he didn't send a letter, and the courts didn't send a letter on his behalf, then the legality of brexit would be forever called into question, and they'd probably just revoke article 50 with a SO24
The whole "I won't ask for an extension" is a non-starter