Message from @Eccles
Discord ID: 631425841179656192
Even if the PM doesn't break the law
And still is going to leave no deal
And I think Boris is unwise to try and get around the law this way
I don't see any significant benefit to it
You don't seem to understand that the court would be acting on behalf of the executive even if it doesn't break the law
It would show that the courts can just overrule the executive even if they are within the law
It's a precident
It'd be acting on behalf of Boris
He is the executive
Boris doesn't send the letter
He's also subject to the same laws as the rest of us
The executive of the UKs does
The office does
Eccles baseless point
I already said if he found a way around the law
This would still. Apply
Put that strawman down
Conjecture
Your impossible
Seriously
The only precident that would be set is that the executive is subject to the courts enforcing the law
Ignoring my point
Geez
Like I said
If he's found a way around the law, then the court ruling will be immaterial
Not from what being reported
Unless you've seen the case files
What is being reported?
That the case is attempting to get the court to send a letter on behalf of boris before the Benn deadline is even up?
Haven't seen that being reported
Obvious they are going to do the legal groundwork before the deadline since there won't be time after
So don't see what the issue is
And I continue to state, he'd be unwise not to send the letter
He would be plenty wise to not do it
If its legal
Links to infrmation supporting your points are allowed, you know. Actually, would prbably be benefical
I'm attempting to find it, read it a few days ago, however things may have changed due to yesterday's ruling
If it has I will accept that
I cannot find that specific report, therefore I must be mistaken
The clerk distinction here would be more of they send the letter for him
Or they force him to sign it