You don't seem to understand that the court would be acting on behalf of the executive even if it doesn't break the law

It would show that the courts can just overrule the executive even if they are within the law

It's a precident

It'd be acting on behalf of Boris

He is the executive

Boris doesn't send the letter

He's also subject to the same laws as the rest of us

The executive of the UKs does

The office does

Eccles baseless point

I already said if he found a way around the law

This would still. Apply

Put that strawman down

Conjecture

Your impossible

Seriously

The only precident that would be set is that the executive is subject to the courts enforcing the law

Ignoring my point

Geez

Like I said

If he's found a way around the law, then the court ruling will be immaterial

Not from what being reported

Unless you've seen the case files

What is being reported?

That the case is attempting to get the court to send a letter on behalf of boris before the Benn deadline is even up?

Haven't seen that being reported

Obvious they are going to do the legal groundwork before the deadline since there won't be time after

So don't see what the issue is

And I continue to state, he'd be unwise not to send the letter

He would be plenty wise to not do it

If its legal

Links to infrmation supporting your points are allowed, you know. Actually, would prbably be benefical

I'm attempting to find it, read it a few days ago, however things may have changed due to yesterday's ruling

If it has I will accept that

I cannot find that specific report, therefore I must be mistaken

The clerk distinction here would be more of they send the letter for him

Or they force him to sign it

If they force him to sign it, OK maybe

They wouldn't need for him to sign it, they can send a letter on his behalf

Send for him?

Court acting as executive