Message from @Лт. Бакугоу Катсуки (казненный)
Discord ID: 558939688291794954
Christian Communism = heresy.
Prove me wrong.
Communists: Lenin is not impressed
Christians: John Paul II is not impressed
My Nazbol mantra:
*Progress without Degeneracy;
Tradition without Backwardness*
We havent met before, but I hope you are pretending to be retarded.
Hello, my name is Tenno. I'm an idealist and I pretend theism and communism can co-exist
You have never read a book apparently. And I know whatever reply you have will be empty of references to coherent ideas
In theory, you are right @Deleted User.
But considering that organized theism has helped perpetuating the system by giving them divine "validation", that's why the historical Left is angry at them.
As what Karl Marx said, "Religion is the opium of the people".
And way long before Marxism was a thing, the Protestant movement kinda got the message of proto-socialism very well.
Okay you are jumping around a lot now. Let's get one thing clear. Theism and Communist doesn't mix
@Deleted User oh.
I stood corrected.
But there is one thing the Protestants of 15th Century Germany didnt get.
Organized theism only helped creating division.
I have nothing against Protestants. I think this was a smart development over pedo-sodomatic catholicism
However I would only ever side with Confessional Lutherans
To think, Protestantism itself broke to a thousand pieces as the bigger body starts stagnating then a smaller group catches fire in zeal to fan up the old flames.
Every Christian is a Church when you think about it. I am merely referring to the idea that the centralised Church is empty of meaning and the future of believers is not in Rome
Also, in socialist parallels, Mao was also envisioning of this concept. He knows that the Party would lose steam eventually and slip back to replace the bourgoise they threw out.
Oh no
That's why he gave his blessing to a few rebellious university students disgusted by the CCP's decadence in the 60s, setting off the Cultural Revolution.
Have you read Hoxha's comments on Mao? I tend to agree with it. The world can be reducable to force-politics and the idea, no, the hope of something outside of it is lacking. Maoism is not exported. And if I might be controversial, it was class-collaborationist to begin with and no true revolution,
...
I was basing from the stand about Maoism as how the Communist Party of the Philippines sees it.
The CPP's flavor of Maoism, a flexible one that can be suited for various social needs for Third World countries, is known as "Marxism-Leninism-Maoism"
Basically, they just charged and refiltered the existing body of socialism the Russians were exporting with Mao's philosophy.
Okay so which historical period are you talking about. After Deng it's a runaway train of justification
The "Maoism that is not exported" is Mao Zedong Thought, as it only applies on Chinese society.
And you are conscious of the fact that the Maoist revolution involved all classes and to extend it's definition as a 'Marxist' revolution is misleading?
Kinda.
Maoism in a sense also kinda has this patriotic taste. That is why its very popular in the Third World.
Marxism in face value works best on already established nation-states, where there's already a deep-seated oligarchy to hate.
In short, creating a new socialist country vs. converting a country into socialism.
Even if I like Mao's philosophy, I don't condone some of his policies I find as idiotic.
Like the Sparrow Campaign for example.
Anyone who has studied Earth Science would facepalm at that, even if he/she is not a left-winger.
The Great Leap Forward also fucked up because of some stupid policies too.