Message from @Borzo
Discord ID: 575682416077832219
lol, no, that is racial supremacy
see how subverterd this is
the whole meaing just lost and a logic out the window
weber dictionary would say that , it is pretty deep. some one mentioned this a couple days back
i think he mentioned something from the 1800s or early 1900s some dude writing about the sybvertion of language
๐
๐
"Racism is logical guys. Your feefees are just in the way."
Thatโs what Racism literally means: Believing a race to be superior to all or one other Race(s)
no that is racial supremacy
Why are you wrting race and racism, with capital leters ?
anyone know this song?
Tim seems cute
<:GWmythsBlobGlare:391322010980057120>
This is why I say @Deleted User is knowledge
Wat
what
What you guys don't seem to realize is that communism and free immigration are idiotic policies to grab if you are the richest country in the world
Communism: You can't have more wealth than your neighbors.
Free immigration: the poorest people in the world can come in.
See a problem with this picture?
did you learn about communism from reagan's decaying corpse or something
Communism is everyone working for the exact same wage
Which is stupid, how can you prove your worth in that system. It's literally a nightmare
yep you learned about communism from reagan
Intelligence is the bane of communists. They really wish everyone had the same intelligence, but it's not true
ain't even learned the basics of unionism
Well,
If you want to redefine communism then don't call yourself a communist
you ever read any books by communists?
I only read sci-fi and fantasy
But communism has never worked
so you're defining communism despite having never read any theory or praxis
Also I watched Petersen debate slajov, and slajov didn't even try to defend communism
So it must be bad
because that's not what the debate was about afaik
It was slated to be about communism so in the first round Petersen talked about the communist manufesto and then slajov talked about something completely off-track (it was still a good speech but it wasn't what they were slated to be debating)
And be basically said he didn't really support it
because zizek is a hegelian and marx didn't support the hegelian dialect iirc