Message from @ApplicationBot
Discord ID: 577114687024398337
frutecake thinking
@💖Koikat💖 i can believe that, they have a migration history stemming from the north, they had christian kingdoms there , and they found anchient structures there so who knows how far it gioes back
the whole place looks like it used to be used for agriculture
there are even some stories and articles on pale skined european looking ppl who dont match the european gentic set
lol
hes stil alive
do you eat raw meat @Varg
@ApplicationBot ow shit, i forgot, sorry aabout the derogative terms
??
but oke reason other way of thinking
i think you just talk about internal scientific deduction
i made fun of the other ways of thinking
science is based in an assumption that the world works according to philosophical naturalism
science is just breaking down things methodically and logically
if you undermine that assumption you get other ways
this is how ppls brains work in varriened degrees
im intretsed in other ways but so sfar you cant pin it down more the "reason" wihich i just gave my opinon on
also, our current science is built upon the science of previous discoveries and has an inherent bias there
well sure
but you wish to contest celcius or something
and not all science is based on previous information and result
or units
well, eventually you need to fit everything into a dominant theory
all side theories that could be just as valid collapse
or ad hoc methods
well, like which temprature thoeries are there , or where
a thoery isnt disproven by default when ontother arises
I prefer the newtonion view of things
im not talking about scientific theories inside science
It's very simple
so if there is another option that option should sill be ther if it isnt false
science is a description of the world
no
there can be other descriptions
science seeks to explain everything in terms of previous paradigms
i dont think so
if you assume the world works like a machine then all new discoveries try to follow that until it breaks
some scientist have a preset of bias sure, but thats ppl being flawed
and isnt science as soo as the bias iis introduced
you explain things in a wrong manner, that seems to be useful for us but doesnt get close to the truth