hes stil alive

do you eat raw meat @Varg

@ApplicationBot ow shit, i forgot, sorry aabout the derogative terms

??

but oke reason other way of thinking

i think you just talk about internal scientific deduction

i made fun of the other ways of thinking

science is based in an assumption that the world works according to philosophical naturalism

science is just breaking down things methodically and logically

if you undermine that assumption you get other ways

this is how ppls brains work in varriened degrees

im intretsed in other ways but so sfar you cant pin it down more the "reason" wihich i just gave my opinon on

also, our current science is built upon the science of previous discoveries and has an inherent bias there

well sure

but you wish to contest celcius or something

it's not just names

and not all science is based on previous information and result

or units

well, eventually you need to fit everything into a dominant theory

all side theories that could be just as valid collapse

or ad hoc methods

well, like which temprature thoeries are there , or where

a thoery isnt disproven by default when ontother arises

I prefer the newtonion view of things

im not talking about scientific theories inside science

It's very simple

so if there is another option that option should sill be ther if it isnt false

science is a description of the world

no

there can be other descriptions

science seeks to explain everything in terms of previous paradigms

i dont think so

if you assume the world works like a machine then all new discoveries try to follow that until it breaks

some scientist have a preset of bias sure, but thats ppl being flawed

and isnt science as soo as the bias iis introduced

you explain things in a wrong manner, that seems to be useful for us but doesnt get close to the truth

it only breaks, because some "scientist" fucked up

Somalia is being overrun by Negroids.

newton's mechanics eventually werent good enough to describe everything

so we found relativity