Have you not read Marx?
it is, dictatorship of the proletariat means the proletariat having power over the bourgoisie, at the contrary that the dictatorship of the capital
The collective becoming the bourgeois and eliminating their oppression is the very essence of communism
no
that would be distributism
the economy isn't privately owned
the means
however
the means of productions are collective, but personal property is for each worker
who has worked for it
And the worker is not the collective?
"to each according to his contribution" is socialism
the worker is part of the proletariat in capitalism
No the collective in the ideal communist society
yes
And there is no bourgeois?
in communism it's "to each according to his needs"
there isn't bourgeois in socialism or communism
Each according to his contribution sounds like a trade or merit system more than socialism
If there is no bourgeois then who controls production?
the state/the workers
If the workers are the proles then they do not control production
in the USSR they were owned publicly
wtf is this?
The state controlling the production makes the state the bourgeois
in anarchist projects they were owned by the workers directly (Self-management)
@Cosmetic Hey that avatar is my waifu hands off
yeah uhhhhhh
nah
she mine monica
the state doesn't extract surplus value, if something taxes
Get your grubby hands off my anime waifu
it's a step towards communism
no communism
otherwise they couldn't defend themselves
bad bad
@Cosmetic Johaness trying to survive being Fascist in our chat.
only capitalism so my Jewish grandparents can get rich 😃
:))))
If they cannot defend themselves without a state and the state is the temporary bourgeois then how do they defend themselves in communism?
