Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 318649880484773888
did he get it?
fuck no
Nope
what did hitler get
put corpratists in high positions of power
such as the military industry
Hitler did not put corporate shills in high places
You need to read up on the people that the /leftfags/ used as examples such as Hjalmer
He put them in power because they were loyal and capable not just because they were "corpratist" what ever you mean by that.
He was pretty close to being a communist
Went from banker to political activist to NSDAP member
He was one of the leaders of the German Democratic Party or whatever that shit was called hold on
Fascism must be authoritarian. A weak government is easily crushed. And then if you have a decentralised society, it is crushed militarily. It is a violent world, authoritarianism is the only way out of this quagmire.
I would have to agree with that point.
Authoritarianism is one of the many revolutionary tools necessary for a healthy society
Once it becomes tyrannical the tyrant is cast out and the masses or the oligarchs take control
Which then pervert themselves and allow for the next
And the next
An authoritarian state is the strongest tool to mobilize a nation to combat threats outside and within as well as solve larger problems.
@Deleted User Working class people's labor creates wealth. The bourgeoisie give workers only a portion of what their labor has created, and takes the rest for themselves despite not doing anything but owning the land. Owning a bunch of empty land isnt hurt
ing anyone, but hiring people for 'productive property' does.
Communism, if it is truly the next destination on the cycle, will itself pervert much like any other progression has
What will take over then?
Assuming that after the fall of authority you don't return to capitalism, or change to communism.
bud, you don't think we'll protect ourselves in our individualistic fashion?
we wont need your forms of government to protect ourselves
we'll arrange that.
The individual contributing to the whole is much more valuable than the individual pretending to be the whole.
What if I gave them a bigger portion of what their labor has created and have them all work for me? Why can't they just form their own communes and Co-ops to compete?
don't about 4/5 business fail
@Deleted User Good question. Communism is predicted as inevitable as it is a resolution to the struggle over the means of production. It is the end of an era. After that is pure productivity, crossing a kind of event horizon.
If at first you don't succeed try again @dindins
you're kidding me
no
Its that simple
do you know how much fucking debt that causes
Every revolution has been a crossing or an end to an era
Feudalism to industry
Because under capitalism, one requires capital to buy land. Workers have tried to get together and tried to form their own factories, but exploitation is more profitable.
If you make money you can pay off debt thats how that works @dindins
@Deleted User Yes, but this different. At no time has humanity experienced complete and conscious economic emancipation. It is very radical transformation. Like a singularity.
Oh, theres a book on debt I haven't read yet but its on my list: "Debt: The first 300 years". Ive heard good things.