https://vid.me/eF0q

Holy shit, that's brilliant

yes

ew why are people unironically doing weird nazi stuff in here

fascism is so fuckin dumb lmao

read literally any of their books and it becomes immediately apparent

that guy johannes the other day didnt seem dumb but the book he linked me to explain fascism was literally retarded

like look at this trainwreck of a paragraph

Let’s get this point down with brutal force. Fuck intellectualism
- intellectualism shouldn’t be standing anywhere near Fascism in
any shape or form. What we mean here by Intellectualism is the
circle-jerking habit of pompous over-intellectualized analysis of
things both great and inane that leads to nothing else but a neverending
dribble that is never converted to Action. Fascism is a path
of Heroic Action, that doesn’t negate contemplation, in fact
contemplation is one of the inherent male forms of Heroism,
however it is a far cry from the phenomenon of Intellectualism
which is directly tied to the process of Involution, small wonder
that Liberals and cultural marxists love it (which are in essence
different names we give to the same enemy as will be shown
later), the main purpose of intellectualism is deconstructive
thinking "to pull at the very fabric of life until there is nothing left
but a thread, they want nothing but nothingness, nothingness
without end."

fascism is a path of heroic action (whatever that means) but also contemplation (somehow) but don't contemplate too much unless you will become a liberal and cultural marxist (which are the same, somehow)

y i k e

"What is Fascism? Unfortunately the questions doesn’t yet have
an answer that would be as precise as, for instance, the answer to
“what is marxism?" It’s not that there is no direct answer, it is just
that nobody ever gave the answer."

ah yes, nobody has ever answered what marxism is

n o b o d y

sorry ill stop

ok nevermind

im gonna break down one more complete trainwreck passage from this book

There's basically infinite numbers of potential ideologies and
world-views, but they all belong to one of two categories, which
are polar opposites and totally irreconcilable. Those two categories
are modernism (often called materialism) and traditionalism
(often called idealism). In modernism, the highest good is to be
comfortable and safe, while avoiding pain and danger. Everything
is good or bad according to that criteria. In traditionalism, the
highest good is truth and the rejection of falsehoods. Everything is
good or bad according to that criteria.
It's very important to note that for modernists, ideas, values and
theories are tools to be used to attain material ends. Those things
have no inherent value in themselves. If truth is in the way of
feeling good, then truth must go. Inversely, for traditionalism, it
is material conditions and possessions that are considered tools -
used for the purpose of attaining and upholding truth. If comfort
and safety are in the way of truth, those things must be sacrificed.

how can there be infinite ideologies and worldviews but they only fall into two distinct ideologies

materialism and idealism are not irreconcilable this is such a fucking bad take kant resolved this 200 years ago

modernism /= materialism

idealism /= traditionalism

materialism and idealism are well-founded terms in philosophy with rich traditions, this writer feels he can just make up what they mean

he then defines a strawman-modernism which strawmans his already flawed definition of materialism

he defines his own ideology "traditionalism" as truth, tautologically making whatever his worldview is 'truth' and whatever opposes it 'false'

he further strawmans his fake-modernism

and scene~

the sheer dogmatism is staggering

there is no actual content to any of this

Me = Good, You = Bad.

lmfao

good summary there

Hello!

Remember to vote Macron next election!

😃

@Firefly Are you ready to vote for Macron?

@Sorghagtani Beki only if his wife sucks my d. personally.