Message from @Sampuka
Discord ID: 332558614113812491
The people who implemented communism failed hard on that front
And I don't see how you could do it any other way
They'd get voted out at the first famine
it's not like it was the leaders' fault the famines happened
Well when you kill those who own the farms because they're bourgeoisie
they called the kulaks as it is technically incorrect to call them bourgeoissie
and they are as far as I know also to blame for the famines
along with bad weather
and just a badly industrialized country
Why would they want the famines?
They make money off of mkaking food
they make money off of selling them
which is an important difference
they owned the wheat so they controlled hte supply
if nothing was done they'd just sit on it until people began starviving and would pay a lot
The famine didn't happen because they hogged the wheat did it
partly I believe
So why didn't they barge their farms and take it?
but I'm no expert here
well that's what the revolution is about
It was already communist by the first big ukranian famine
and suddenly you have class warfare
>People who use the famine as a reason to call Communism obsolete
Hey remember the Irish Potato Famine?
I could use many reasons fam
famine is luckily a pretty unlikely thing to happen today
at least in the industrialized world which includes russia today
dunno about china tbh
and india
It's retarded that just because there was a famine people think it MUST have been Communism's fault.
It stands out because capitalistic societies don't get that at all
Unless a war is happening
Irish Potato Famine
That was the government making the Irish starve
Thus it was Capitalism's fault.
not capitalism, which would make it possible to sell the irish their food
government stands in the way of capitalism often
So when there's famine in a Communist country it's Communism's fault but when it's in a Capitalist country it's not Capitalism's fault.
Amazing logic
That's not what I said