Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 336381714572247040


2017-07-17 05:37:55 UTC  

Though still, if you are going to free the ECONOMY, then what will stop capitalism from returning?

2017-07-17 05:37:55 UTC  

Capitalism is meaningless without the competition for resources. You will be free to pursue the perfect of yourself and your goals.

2017-07-17 05:38:09 UTC  

You cannot be free to do anything other than your function

2017-07-17 05:38:21 UTC  

Your function? What is my function?

2017-07-17 05:38:30 UTC  

In the hypothetical commune

2017-07-17 05:38:48 UTC  

Who said anything about a commune?

2017-07-17 05:38:49 UTC  

And good question

2017-07-17 05:39:01 UTC  

Who do you even ask in a communist system?

2017-07-17 05:39:25 UTC  

I did. Communism implies there is a *commune*

2017-07-17 05:39:32 UTC  

Socialism prepares society to enter into a communist society.

2017-07-17 05:39:58 UTC  

So, especially in the early phases, you might be required to work certain jobs.

2017-07-17 05:40:01 UTC  

Socialism being a transition state only is bollocks

2017-07-17 05:40:06 UTC  

@Deleted User Though I have heard numerous times that socialism comes after communism.

2017-07-17 05:40:06 UTC  

Is it?

2017-07-17 05:40:10 UTC  

It defeats the purpose of socialism

2017-07-17 05:40:19 UTC  

At least in a practical sense

2017-07-17 05:40:28 UTC  

Whoever said socialism comes after communism is a retard.

2017-07-17 05:40:29 UTC  

Same as it defeats communism

2017-07-17 05:40:37 UTC  

>Socialism
>Practical

2017-07-17 05:40:49 UTC  

No no I meant making it to be simply the state between capitalism and communism

2017-07-17 05:40:50 UTC  

Pick one.

2017-07-17 05:41:08 UTC  

There might as well not be a word for that other than "chaos" if there's nothing behind socialism other than 'muh property'

2017-07-17 05:41:21 UTC  

Why is socialism as a bridge to communism, self-defeating

2017-07-17 05:41:23 UTC  

?

2017-07-17 05:42:48 UTC  

It implies concessions that take away from the end goal and risk departure from it at all

2017-07-17 05:43:27 UTC  

You cannot have communism if there is a king, you cannot have communism if there is a consul

2017-07-17 05:43:58 UTC  

IMO socialism should not be a transition state. Nor should it be related to communism. It should instead be something entirely different but very much similar.

2017-07-17 05:44:10 UTC  

Capitalism must be dismantled on a global stage, first of all. This is no easy feat. But it is necessary in order to solves the contradictions between classes that cannot be imposed forever.

2017-07-17 05:44:32 UTC  

The community/the social ownership of production and its fruits should be the goal of a true socialist society

2017-07-17 05:44:42 UTC  

Of course.

2017-07-17 05:44:46 UTC  

Trotsky, marx, lenin, and stalin all failed at that.

2017-07-17 05:44:49 UTC  

Without the elimination of individual mandate, and without the elimination of property

2017-07-17 05:44:57 UTC  

However property may be relegated by the community

2017-07-17 05:44:58 UTC  

And it is more present than ever.

2017-07-17 05:45:10 UTC  

How do you even believe it is possible to do it with communism?

2017-07-17 05:45:20 UTC  

@Deleted User Can you STFU for a second?

2017-07-17 05:45:44 UTC  

Now that was rude.

2017-07-17 05:47:00 UTC  

@Deleted User I don't understand your criticism. Without addressing exploitation everywhere, outside of your own lands, then it will be a threat and invite the repressive forces of capitalism to return.

2017-07-17 05:48:04 UTC  

Who said others cannot be empowered by a socialist nation or people?

2017-07-17 05:48:06 UTC  

This is why Socialism is authoritarian. Because it requires the focus of the masses in the fight.

2017-07-17 05:48:35 UTC  

I am trying to understand why you think there is a problem with socialism as a means to an ends.