Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 339695091428098060
and probably would need to remove other ethnicities to make that possible
or at least races
It's in the name Ethno state
So here is the end game, you have dominium in some form over the globe, conflicts still exist, because they are built on the fascist model, which is 'look out for your own'. People's differences always exist, so there will always be conflict, under this model.
Can't wait for the world to end just so ugly dyke cunts like these won't be able to exist anymore
Look out for your own, meaning your own people
WHAT ARE THOOOOOSE?!
an ethnostate wouldn't have a dominion as such, or at least would remove the other ethnicites which would remove difference and thus conflict
would be removed as well
that is only if an ethnostates goal was world domination
There will always be different and conflict. Every state was an ethnostate at one point and those were even more violent times. We actually live in an age of peace.
Which I think normally an ethnostate is quite isolationist
Statistically
People will never run out of shit to kill each other over
@Deleted User Many things have changed then, not just the fact that ethnostates no longer reside in the western world..
Until we evolve significantly or transhumanism becomes a thing
Whichever comes first
Most likely neither
Organisations have formed solely to stop war in the world
There is always a conflict against time. Given that evolution has mutations and given relative location, differences develop. No matter how much you assume a singular identity, there will be difference that emerge in the future via mutations, and they will change these differences into conflict. Enthnocentrism is not an answer to the next level of human develop, because it harbours antagonisms.
Srs???
No fucken way dude
woah
You imply that ethnostates are the sole reason for the enormous amounts of war in the past centuries
When there are many other variables
Nice strawman
@Deleted User Literally what @Deleted User when gene editing becomes a thing, mutations are irrelevant
You're the leftycucks, I thought you all despised the idea of ethnostates
I'm not leftypol
I'm not either
literally a hardcore ethno nationalist
Not you
If you want to clone the future, you can not specialise the population into different roles. This is very ineffective.
gene editing doesn't equal cloning
What does gene editing mean?
You're just plagerizing Marx right now
Nigger
^
Don't forget niggerdom
@Deleted User @Deleted User it's called eugenics btw