Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 339695346915737610


2017-07-26 09:03:47 UTC  

Look out for your own, meaning your own people

2017-07-26 09:04:26 UTC  

WHAT ARE THOOOOOSE?!

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/339694443890212874/20170726_190407.jpg

2017-07-26 09:04:32 UTC  

an ethnostate wouldn't have a dominion as such, or at least would remove the other ethnicites which would remove difference and thus conflict

2017-07-26 09:04:42 UTC  

would be removed as well

2017-07-26 09:05:19 UTC  

that is only if an ethnostates goal was world domination

2017-07-26 09:05:39 UTC  

There will always be different and conflict. Every state was an ethnostate at one point and those were even more violent times. We actually live in an age of peace.

2017-07-26 09:05:39 UTC  

Which I think normally an ethnostate is quite isolationist

2017-07-26 09:05:43 UTC  

Statistically

2017-07-26 09:06:06 UTC  

People will never run out of shit to kill each other over

2017-07-26 09:06:17 UTC  

@Deleted User Many things have changed then, not just the fact that ethnostates no longer reside in the western world..

2017-07-26 09:06:27 UTC  

Until we evolve significantly or transhumanism becomes a thing

2017-07-26 09:06:30 UTC  

Whichever comes first

2017-07-26 09:06:32 UTC  

Most likely neither

2017-07-26 09:06:32 UTC  

Organisations have formed solely to stop war in the world

2017-07-26 09:06:46 UTC  

There is always a conflict against time. Given that evolution has mutations and given relative location, differences develop. No matter how much you assume a singular identity, there will be difference that emerge in the future via mutations, and they will change these differences into conflict. Enthnocentrism is not an answer to the next level of human develop, because it harbours antagonisms.

2017-07-26 09:07:01 UTC  

@Deleted User You mean shit has changed over the last several centuries?

2017-07-26 09:07:02 UTC  

Srs???

2017-07-26 09:07:13 UTC  

No fucken way dude

2017-07-26 09:07:13 UTC  

woah

2017-07-26 09:07:40 UTC  

You imply that ethnostates are the sole reason for the enormous amounts of war in the past centuries

2017-07-26 09:08:01 UTC  

When there are many other variables

2017-07-26 09:08:08 UTC  

Nice strawman

2017-07-26 09:08:23 UTC  

@Deleted User Literally what @Deleted User when gene editing becomes a thing, mutations are irrelevant

2017-07-26 09:08:31 UTC  

You're the leftycucks, I thought you all despised the idea of ethnostates

2017-07-26 09:08:41 UTC  

I'm not leftypol

2017-07-26 09:08:46 UTC  

I'm not either

2017-07-26 09:08:51 UTC  

literally a hardcore ethno nationalist

2017-07-26 09:08:59 UTC  

Not you

2017-07-26 09:09:07 UTC  

If you want to clone the future, you can not specialise the population into different roles. This is very ineffective.

2017-07-26 09:09:28 UTC  

gene editing doesn't equal cloning

2017-07-26 09:09:40 UTC  

What does gene editing mean?

2017-07-26 09:09:43 UTC  

You're just plagerizing Marx right now

2017-07-26 09:09:43 UTC  

Nigger

2017-07-26 09:09:51 UTC  

^

2017-07-26 09:09:56 UTC  

Don't forget niggerdom

2017-07-26 09:10:05 UTC  

@Deleted User @Deleted User it's called eugenics btw

2017-07-26 09:10:11 UTC  

Mutations still exist in eugenics.

2017-07-26 09:10:24 UTC  

@Rayo Jeff#6169 It is eugenics, but gene editing is artifical

2017-07-26 09:10:30 UTC  

ever heard of CRISPR

2017-07-26 09:10:35 UTC  
2017-07-26 09:10:41 UTC  

Look it up