There will always be different and conflict. Every state was an ethnostate at one point and those were even more violent times. We actually live in an age of peace.

Which I think normally an ethnostate is quite isolationist

Statistically

People will never run out of shit to kill each other over

@Deleted User Many things have changed then, not just the fact that ethnostates no longer reside in the western world..

Until we evolve significantly or transhumanism becomes a thing

Whichever comes first

Most likely neither

Organisations have formed solely to stop war in the world

There is always a conflict against time. Given that evolution has mutations and given relative location, differences develop. No matter how much you assume a singular identity, there will be difference that emerge in the future via mutations, and they will change these differences into conflict. Enthnocentrism is not an answer to the next level of human develop, because it harbours antagonisms.

@Deleted User You mean shit has changed over the last several centuries?

Srs???

No fucken way dude

woah

You imply that ethnostates are the sole reason for the enormous amounts of war in the past centuries

When there are many other variables

Nice strawman

@Deleted User Literally what @Deleted User when gene editing becomes a thing, mutations are irrelevant

You're the leftycucks, I thought you all despised the idea of ethnostates

I'm not leftypol

I'm not either

literally a hardcore ethno nationalist

Not you

If you want to clone the future, you can not specialise the population into different roles. This is very ineffective.

gene editing doesn't equal cloning

What does gene editing mean?

You're just plagerizing Marx right now

Nigger

^

Don't forget niggerdom

@Deleted User @Deleted User it's called eugenics btw

Mutations still exist in eugenics.

@Rayo Jeff#6169 It is eugenics, but gene editing is artifical

ever heard of CRISPR

@Deleted User no

Look it up

it's in it's early stages at the moment

Designer babies?

Theoretically we can edit any appearances of peoples

Ye eugenics is different, but we'd be using the same concept

Can someone please explain how you plan to use 'gene editing' and how it will be applied uniformly to eliminate mutations to eliminate differences in societies genetics? Because if there are differences there is a hotbed for conflict.