Message from @Lavabeard
Discord ID: 340103311199830017
then go read the holy bible Mein kampf
I dont believe you read this
its incredibly boring
if you're up for it I would be interested in testing you on it <:smug:252981277622403072>
open book of course
I honestly think access to data is destructive
kind of like how I feel about democracy
people front about data so much
I didn't mean I read the book
its easier than it everh as been to fool people for example
I meant i've looked up on this before
no felt said he read this twic
e
and I dont believe that for a second
nobody reads this
I doubt all the authors did
this says some interesting stuff
Rushton grants that the IQ tests of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, with a smaller right tail towards the very high IQs. Thus the proportion of very high IQs and geniuses is much higher among Whites than Asians: M. Masters, “The Morality of Survival” (Part II), American Renaissance, August 1995, pp. 1, 3-5, at p.3. For IQ elitists such as Lynn and Rushton, this is a fact which should be of supreme analytical and theoretical importance because it is high IQ genius which builds and maintains civilisations, not mean/average intelligences.
Instead, no mention or development of this is made by Lynn and Rushton. Rushton said to Richard McCulloch at the second American Renaissance conference that McCulloch “shouldn’t find too much comfort in that.
so uh
is another blog post
from 1995
well
magazine column
same thing
Ye
and this is what's written there
>There is evidence that this might not happen; intelligence testing of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, suggesting a smaller right tail of the IQ distribution and a smaller percentage of innovative individuals.
no reference to anything
it looks like a valid reference at first
its not
I wouldn't be surprised if it is
There is an enormous difference in innovation when comparing Asian civilization to Western Civilization
Sorry im back now anything i miss
of course both are notable, but there is definitely a significant difference
I'm going to keep searching for a source regardless
asia is home to a different culture
a taoist would literally laugh at the suggestion that innovation is important
I thought Taoism was mainly popular in China