people front about data so much

I didn't mean I read the book

its easier than it everh as been to fool people for example

I meant i've looked up on this before

no felt said he read this twic

e

and I dont believe that for a second

nobody reads this

I doubt all the authors did

https://thecross-roads.org/race-culture-nation/25-the-myth-of-east-asian-intellectual-supremacy

this says some interesting stuff

Rushton grants that the IQ tests of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, with a smaller right tail towards the very high IQs. Thus the proportion of very high IQs and geniuses is much higher among Whites than Asians: M. Masters, “The Morality of Survival” (Part II), American Renaissance, August 1995, pp. 1, 3-5, at p.3. For IQ elitists such as Lynn and Rushton, this is a fact which should be of supreme analytical and theoretical importance because it is high IQ genius which builds and maintains civilisations, not mean/average intelligences.
Instead, no mention or development of this is made by Lynn and Rushton. Rushton said to Richard McCulloch at the second American Renaissance conference that McCulloch “shouldn’t find too much comfort in that.

so uh

what he references there

is another blog post

from 1995

well

magazine column

same thing

https://www.amren.com/archives/back-issues/august-1995/

Ye

and this is what's written there

>There is evidence that this might not happen; intelligence testing of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, suggesting a smaller right tail of the IQ distribution and a smaller percentage of innovative individuals.

no reference to anything

it looks like a valid reference at first

its not

I wouldn't be surprised if it is

There is an enormous difference in innovation when comparing Asian civilization to Western Civilization

Sorry im back now anything i miss

of course both are notable, but there is definitely a significant difference

I'm going to keep searching for a source regardless

asia is home to a different culture

a taoist would literally laugh at the suggestion that innovation is important

I thought Taoism was mainly popular in China

and Korea

it is

china is where most of the east asians live

and if they're not in china

they're in Japan

then they're in indochina (shitty jungle)

or japan