Message from @Lavabeard
Discord ID: 340101820632268801
thats not distribution
those are means
Whites are literally the master race basically
you want sample sizes?
hahaha
<:annoyed:266788191149752321>
you posted a graph showing a wider distribution of white IQs
I am asking *for that*
than asians
so that despite asians being higher IQ that whites have more genius level IQ people
that is the implication from the graph anyway
which so far is unsubstantiated
I've read this shit before
I just can't save it as a file or anything
so i'll look for it
Just read it and learn the truth
then go read the holy bible Mein kampf
I dont believe you read this
its incredibly boring
if you're up for it I would be interested in testing you on it <:smug:252981277622403072>
I honestly think access to data is destructive
kind of like how I feel about democracy
people front about data so much
I didn't mean I read the book
its easier than it everh as been to fool people for example
I meant i've looked up on this before
no felt said he read this twic
e
and I dont believe that for a second
nobody reads this
I doubt all the authors did
this says some interesting stuff
Rushton grants that the IQ tests of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, with a smaller right tail towards the very high IQs. Thus the proportion of very high IQs and geniuses is much higher among Whites than Asians: M. Masters, “The Morality of Survival” (Part II), American Renaissance, August 1995, pp. 1, 3-5, at p.3. For IQ elitists such as Lynn and Rushton, this is a fact which should be of supreme analytical and theoretical importance because it is high IQ genius which builds and maintains civilisations, not mean/average intelligences.
Instead, no mention or development of this is made by Lynn and Rushton. Rushton said to Richard McCulloch at the second American Renaissance conference that McCulloch “shouldn’t find too much comfort in that.
so uh
what he references there
is another blog post
from 1995
well
magazine column